Bible Believers' Newsletter 831
"We focus on the present Truth – what Jesus is doing now. . ."
ISSN 1442-8660
Christian greetings in the precious Name of our Lord Jesus Christ; we are happy to be together again for fellowship around God's unchanging Word. Your brother-in-Christ
The Lord told Isaiah, "Go, and tell Israel, keep on listening, but do not perceive; keep on looking, but do not understand. Render the hearts of this people insensitive, their ears dull, and their eyes dim, lest they see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts, and repent and be healed." Isaiah spoke God's Word; it came to pass and his 'third pull' is current today. Israel committed genocide by intermarriage with Hittites and Canaanites of Edom and Khazaria.
In their apostasy the God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel sent John the Baptist the Elijah of Isaiah 40:3 and Malachi 3:1 to introduce Messiah. Jewry's Edomite king decapitated John and the nation laid hands on Messiah and slaughtered "the Lamb of God that takes away the sins of the world." Israel's spiritual vision and hearing have been "sealed till the time of the end" when 144,000 will see, hear and then martyred (Isaiah 6:9-13; Daniel 12:4, 9; Matthew 27:25; Revelation 6:11).
God's servant nation Israel types Christendom (so called): as "all Israel is not Israel," precious few who profess the lovely Name of our Lord Jesus Christ are Christians. Israel has committed both natural and spiritual genocide by miscegenation and hybridizing God's unchanging Word, so has her antitype the nominal church (Matthew 15:9; 24:37; Revelation 22:18-19).
God is no respecter of persons: He has opened eyes and ears and baptized elect Gentiles into the liberty of Christ through seven Church Ages but now as we approach the end of man's day and the Gentile dispensation the world is apostate. God sent William Branham, the Elijah of Malachi 4:5-6, Matthew 17:11 and Revelation 10:7 to introduce Christ's second or 'parousia' Coming and "proclaim the Day of Vengeance of our God." When the world church system rejected his Message "they crucified to themselves the Son of God afresh and put Him to an open shame" for his Message is Christ the fullness of the Word (Hebrews 6:6; I Corinthians 13:10). Following her type established by Israel the worldly church is willfully blind to Gospel Light having stopped her ears to the revealed Word of the "present Truth—what Jesus is doing now" (Romans 11:32; II Timothy 4:3-4; Revelation 3:17-20).
Recently I heard Billy Bragg interviewed and took down a line from one of his songs as it reminded me of Brother Branham: "No one knows nothing anymore; Nobody really knows the score." With these words I ask you please to welcome our friend and contributing author, John Kaminski, whom you should all know by now. John has written our main article, "Nothing ever gets solved." Why so? Because "No one knows nothing anymore."
John's article demonstrates that the prophesied 'squeeze' under the Roman fourth beast, whose US image "will tread down and devour the whole earth and break it in pieces," is in the process of fulfillment; it will "overcome Israel and receive authority over every kindred, tongue and nation" (Daniel 7:23-24; Revelation 13:5-8). What is Rome but Jewry? Messiah Jesus said so (Genesis 27:39-41; Isaiah 34: Isaiah 63; Ezekiel 38 – 39; Malachi 1:1-4; Romans 9:13; Revelation 2:9; 3:9). When Jewish Bolsheviks conquered Russia they murdered the King, his Family and the Administration, usurped government, imposed Judaeo-Communism, then killed dissidents and Christians precisely as they conquered Iraq, Libya, Kosovo, Iran (under Mossadegh), the Philippines, Haiti, Colombia, Nicaragua, and many other countries. Those regimes were not changed by popular revolutions but from the top. Bolsheviks like foreign insurgents in Syria, Ukraine, Egypt and elsewhere were and are "dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns" by the Banksters.
God does not change his ways, and neither does Satan change his ways. Satan has taken over and communized the United States, Britain and other colonies of the City of London and taken control by characterless men and women at the top. Communism, fascism and Nazism are spirits that oppress and possess people. Jesus called communism it "Laodicea," which means "people's rights,"—Liberalism, feminism, humanism, capitalism and socialism satisfy selfishness and greed at the cost of others. Consider the character of those elected to re-present the wishes of their electors in the 'free world' so-called. Many are "dumb, stupid animals [dressed in suits] to be used as pawns" by the Banksters, then destroyed like the German Administration at Nuremberg, Stalin and Mao's top echelon, or discharged like dictator Obama's senior generals once they have accomplished their assignments because they know too much truth. Hence "Nothing ever gets solved, and the truth NEVER comes out in the end."
We are raised on lies from the cradle to the grave. In Sunday school and church we are told that God is a trinity. Not only is the word and concept absent from Scripture but this is Babylonian paganism. Accordingly the false church baptizes in three Titles, Father, Son and Holy Ghost (Matthew 28:18) instead of one Name, Lord Jesus Christ (Luke 24:47; Acts 2:38-39). Even our food is hybridized so that instead of being God's Word, Spirit and Life, it is man-made death. History also is a pack of lies and Jewish propaganda; our heroes are actually the villains and our so-called democratic system of government a party-political Hegelian sham. Truths have all been dropped down Orwell's memory hole along with correct spelling, good grammar and polite manners: "Nothing ever gets solved" because "No one knows nothing anymore."
The world is indicted and without excuse because "In the days of the Voice of the seventh angel, [William Branham 1909-1965], when he shall begin to sound, the mystery of God should be finished, as He has declared to His servants the prophets" (Revelation 10:7). The mystery of God is finished and we live in the days of the Voice sent "to give us the Spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of Him: that the eyes of our understanding being enlightened we might know what is the hope of His calling, and what the riches of the glory of His inheritance in the saints, and what is the exceeding greatness of His power toward us who believe, according to the working of His mighty resurrection and translation power which He wrought in Christ, when He raised Him from the dead, and set Him at His own right hand in the heavenly places" (Ephesians 1:17-20).
The unwritten mystery uttered by the voices of the seven thunders was revealed to God's elect by the revelation of the Seven Seals when we were "caught up in the Spirit to see the things which must be after the end of the Church Ages" (Revelation 4:1-2). This revelation has placed us in the capstone of the Body which is Christ the Head and fullness of the Word: 'agape,' the greatest gift that casts out fear caused by uncertainty concerning the future.
We also have an article by Pastor Don Elmore documenting some history he was not taught concerning the fourth beast of Daniel and Revelation, the Judaeo-Roman Catholic false church. He shows the influence of Simon Magus, "A false Messiah, who practiced magical arts and subsequently attempted, by the aid and sanction of Christianity, to set up a rival universal religion (The Dictionary of Religion and Ethics, Vol. II, p. 514). Pastor Elmore demonstrates from the Scripture how it was absolutely impossible for Peter to have been Pope of the Roman church.
This week in Newsletter 830 we released Bible Believers' Newsletters eYearbooks. Like this Newsletter these are absolutely FREE to everyone, especially those who love our Lord Jesus regardless of their denomination. Please forward a copy of this index page to your friends within and without the circle of this Message, for the time is short it could be your mouse click that awakens the last elect.
Pastor Amin Khaki was arrested March 5, 2014 and continues to be held in VEVAK's office in Ahwaz, Iran. Brothers Daniel Baroun and Ziya Bahmani are being held in Koran Prison at Ahwaz. All three are being held without charge; please remember them in prayer and email the Office of the Supreme Leader, His Excellency Sayyid Ali Khamenei.
This Newsletter serves those of like precious faith. Whoever will receive the truth is welcome to feed their soul from the waters of the River of Life. Everything here presented should be confirmed personally in your own Bible.
Anthony Grigor-Scott
Standoff in Nevada: another Federal Siege against the Innocent
April 10, 2014 — With the memory of Ruby Ridge, Idaho, and Waco, Texas, still very vivid in the collective memory of the American people comes another example of a federal government run amuck. A rancher in Nevada is watching the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) seize his cattle and arrest his son for simply taking pictures of the events. BLM has also placed several federal snipers around his home with their high-powered rifles trained on his family. The last report I read said more than 200 federal agents are now surrounding the homestead complete with attack helicopters. All that seems to be missing are tanks . . .
Did the family do anything violent? No. Did they do anything immoral? No. Did they even do anything wrong? No. Did they do anything illegal? Well, that's where the story gets interesting.
Cliven Bundy's family has been grazing cattle on their ranchland since the 1880s. But in 1993, the federal government reclassified 600,000 acres of land, including the land that the Bundy cattle have been grazing on forever. The pretext used by the feds for seizing the land was to protect some "endangered" tortoise. However, the feds would allow Cliven to continue to graze his cattle on the land—if he pays the federal government for the privilege. The rancher refuses to pay. . . Full story: youtube.com newswithviews.com
US behind Rwanda Genocide: installing Proxy State in Central Africa
April 06, 2014 — The 1994 Rwandan "genocide" served strictly strategic/geopolitical objectives. The ethnic massacres were a stumbling blow to France's credibility which enabled the US to establish a neocolonial foothold in Central Africa. From a distinctly Franco-Belgian colonial setting, the Rwandan capital Kigali has become—under the expatriate Tutsi led RPF government—distinctly Anglo-American. . . The militarization of Uganda was an integral part of US foreign policy. The build-up of the Ugandan UPDF Forces and of the Rwandan Patriotic Army (RPA) had been supported by the US and Britain. The British had provided military training at the Jinja military base . . .
Following the installation of a US client regime in Rwanda in 1994, US trained Rwandan and Ugandan forces intervened in former Zaire—a stronghold of French and Belgian influence under President Mobutu Sese Seko. Amply documented, US special operations troops—mainly Green Berets from the 3rd Special Forces Group based at Fort Bragg, N.C.— had been actively training the Rwandan Patriotic Army (RPA). . . "Washington pumped military aid into Kagame's army, and US Army Special Forces and other military personnel trained hundreds of Rwandan troops. But Kagame and his colleagues had designs of their own. . .
"What one forgets to say is that, if France was on one side, the Americans were on the other, arming the Ugandans, who armed the Tutsis. I don't want to portray a showdown between the French and the Anglo-Saxons, but the truth must be told" . . . Full story: globalresearch.ca
Comment: Do you see the mark of the beast writ large over its US image and NATO neo-Roman Empire? Do you recognize the emergence of Revelation 17:12-18? And how about the 'squeeze'? Do you see its formwork in Africa?
Boutros Boutros-Ghali, who was Secretary General of the UN during the Rwandan war declared to me that, "the Rwandan genocide was 100 percent American responsibility." The man whom US State Department officials called "Frenchie" before they unceremoniously ejected him from the UN explained: "The US effort to prevent the effective deployment of a UN force for Rwanda succeeded with the strong support of Britain" . . . The invasion of Rwanda on October 1, 1990 by 4,000 Ugandan uniform-bearing troops that would become the army of the Rwandan Patriotic Front was not only a breach of international law, it was the crime against peace, the "supreme international crime" as Nuremberg Judge Birkett described it. (In its unfathomable wisdom, The New York Times Magazine in a glossy 2002 feature described that invasion as simply "increased tensions." globalresearch.ca).
Australian lawyer and UN war crimes investigator Michael Hourigan was given the task of investigating the assassination of the Rwandan and Burundian presidents by shooting their plane out of the sky over Kigali on April 6, 1994. Hourigan said that he had submitted firsthand witness testimony that Kagame ordered the assassinations but that his report had been suppressed by the tribunal's chief prosecutor, Louise Arbour: "You've got to stop that, and you've got to gag that man and send him walking." Hourigan's death this week went unnoted by the press (globalresearch.ca).
Kagame's Mass Atrocities in Rwanda and the Congo (strategic-culture.org).
The missiles that downed the presidential aircraft carrying the Presidents of Rwanda and Burundi came from the United States and were delivered to the RPF. Canadian Justice Louise Arbour, who served as special prosecutor for the International War Crimes Tribunal looking into the Rwandan genocide, ordered her subordinates, who included former Royal Canadian Mounted Police deputy commissioner Al Breau, to cut short their investigation when it became clear that it was leading to the conclusion that the RPF and their American patrons were involved in planning the aircraft attack. . . (Wayne Madsen).
The Anti-Empire Report #127
April 7, 2014 — Indoctrinating a new generation
Is there anyone out there who still believes that Barack Obama, when he's speaking about American foreign policy, is capable of being anything like an honest man? In a March 26 talk in Belgium to "European youth", the president fed his audience one falsehood, half-truth, blatant omission, or hypocrisy after another. If George W. Bush had made some of these statements, Obama supporters would not hesitate to shake their head, roll their eyes, or smirk. Here's a sample:
– "In defending its actions, Russian leaders have further claimed Kosovo as a precedent—an example they say of the West interfering in the affairs of a smaller country, just as they're doing now. But NATO only intervened after the people of Kosovo were systematically brutalized and killed for years."
Most people who follow such things are convinced that the 1999 US/NATO bombing of the Serbian province of Kosovo took place only after the Serbian-forced deportation of ethnic Albanians from Kosovo was well underway; which is to say that the bombing was launched to stop this "ethnic cleansing." In actuality, the systematic deportations of large numbers of people did not begin until a few days after the bombing began, and was clearly a reaction to it, born of Serbia's extreme anger and powerlessness over the bombing. This is easily verified by looking at a daily newspaper for the few days before the bombing began the night of March 23/24, 1999, and the few days following. Or simply look at the New York Times of March 26, page 1, which reads:
. . . with the NATO bombing already begun, a deepening sense of fear took hold in Pristina [the main city of Kosovo] that the Serbs would now vent their rage against ethnic Albanian civilians in retaliation. [Emphasis added]
On March 27, we find the first reference to a "forced march" or anything of that nature.
But the propaganda version is already set in marble.
– "And Kosovo only left Serbia after a referendum was organized, not outside the boundaries of international law, but in careful cooperation with the United Nations and with Kosovo's neighbors. None of that even came close to happening in Crimea."
None of that even came close to happening in Kosovo either. The story is false. The referendum the president speaks of never happened. Did the mainstream media pick up on this or on the previous example? If any reader comes across such I'd appreciate being informed.
Crimea, by the way, did have a referendum. A real one.
– "Workers and engineers gave life to the Marshall Plan . . . As the Iron Curtain fell here in Europe, the iron fist of apartheid was unclenched, and Nelson Mandela emerged upright, proud, from prison to lead a multiracial democracy. Latin American nations rejected dictatorship and built new democracies . . . "
The president might have mentioned that the main beneficiary of the Marshall Plan was US corporations, that the United States played an indispensable role in Mandela being caught and imprisoned, and that virtually all the Latin American dictatorships owed their very existence to Washington. Instead, the European youth were fed the same party line that their parents were fed, as were all Americans.
– "Yes, we believe in democracy—with elections that are free and fair."
In this talk, the main purpose of which was to lambaste the Russians for their actions concerning Ukraine, there was no mention that the government overthrown in that country with the clear support of the United States had been democratically elected. . . Full story: williamblum.org
Comment: William Blum has found America's Deadliest Export is Democracy.
NGO Documents plan Ukraine War
March 8, 2014 — NGOs caught forging documents for war, insider warns all NGOs infiltrated; 'Independent military observers' for EU-based group OSCE again turned away in Crimea, OSCE branded one more 'vulgar instrument' for foreign interests; and CNN buys the latest State Department hoax.
Seek truth from facts with Illinois University Professor of International Law and former Amnesty board member Francis Boyle; Infowars Editor Paul Joseph Watson; Eric Draitser of Boiling Frogs Post; Ron Paul Institute Executive Director Daniel McAdams; Ukraine protest organizers; Sliman Bouchuiguir, whose NGO fabricated the claims against Libya; and Asst. Secretary of State Vic Nuland. Full story: youtube.com
The Red Line and the Rat Line
April 6, 2014 — In 2011 Barack Obama led an allied military intervention in Libya without consulting the US Congress. Last August, after the sarin attack on the Damascus suburb of Ghouta, he was ready to launch an allied air strike, this time to punish the Syrian government for allegedly crossing the 'red line' he had set in 2012 on the use of chemical weapons. . . Obama's change of mind had its origins at Porton Down, the defence laboratory in Wiltshire. British intelligence had obtained a sample of the sarin used in the 21 August attack and analysis demonstrated that the gas used didn't match the batches known to exist in the Syrian army's chemical weapons arsenal. The message that the case against Syria wouldn't hold up was quickly relayed to the US Joint Chiefs of Staff . . .
The original targets included only military sites and nothing by way of civilian infrastructure. Under White House pressure, the US attack plan evolved into 'a monster strike': two wings of B-52 bombers were shifted to airbases close to Syria, and navy submarines and ships equipped with Tomahawk missiles were deployed. 'Every day the target list was getting longer,' the former intelligence official told me. 'The Pentagon planners said we can't use only Tomahawks to strike at Syria's missile sites because their warheads are buried too far below ground, so the two B-52 air wings with two-thousand pound bombs were assigned to the mission. Then we'll need standby search-and-rescue teams to recover downed pilots and drones for target selection. It became huge.' The new target list was meant to 'completely eradicate any military capabilities Assad had', the former intelligence official said. The core targets included electric power grids, oil and gas depots, all known logistic and weapons depots, all known command and control facilities, and all known military and intelligence buildings.
Britain and France were both to play a part. On 29 August, the day Parliament voted against Cameron's bid to join the intervention, the Guardian reported that he had already ordered six RAF Typhoon fighter jets to be deployed to Cyprus, and had volunteered a submarine capable of launching Tomahawk missiles. The French air force—a crucial player in the 2011 strikes on Libya—was deeply committed, according to an account in Le Nouvel Observateur; François Hollande had ordered several Rafale fighter-bombers to join the American assault. Their targets were reported to be in western Syria...
As intercepts and other data related to the 21 August attacks were gathered, the intelligence community saw evidence to support its suspicions. 'We now know it was a covert action planned by [Donmeh Jewish President] Erdogan's people to push Obama over the red line,' the former intelligence official said. 'They had to escalate to a gas attack in or near Damascus when the UN inspectors'—who arrived in Damascus on 18 August to investigate the earlier use of gas—'were there. The deal was to do something spectacular . . . [but] a recording, allegedly of Erdogan and his associates, was posted to YouTube. It included discussion of a false-flag operation that would justify an incursion by the Turkish military in Syria. . . Full story: lrb.co.uk
Comment: There was a media blackout in Esau's US press. As in World Wars I and II, the 'Allies' are ruled by genocidal megalomaniac psychopaths to whom human life and property, even of their own people, is not worth the life of a sparrow. Clear as day, the neo-Roman Empire and its US image is the enemy. Small wonder Brother Branham said "The white man's a rascal." Given dominion and the honour of bearing the standard of Christ he has sold his all to Esau.
Middle East journalist Sara Elizabeth Williams broke the story of a CIA/US Military run training camp for Syrian rebels [foreign insurgents] in the Jordanian desert. Her story, "I Learned to Fight Like an American at the FSA Training Camp in Jordan." International Syria experts thought her story hugely significant, but it failed to make Esau's US press.
Russia to launch its Payment System in Months, as Disruption Fears Mount
March 24, 2014 — The move by international payment systems Visa and MasterCard to block their use in Russia has unnerved some Russian businesses. Meanwhile, Moscow says its own national payment system may become fully operative within months.
Last week MasterCard and Visa stopped servicing some Russian banks, which shows the Russian market remains the monopoly of international operators.
Although the payment systems resumed operations with Russia's SMP Bank on Sunday, it is estimated clients withdrew about $111 million from their accounts in just two days.
After years of rhetoric over the need to launch a domestic payment system in Russia, it may become a reality soon.
"The payment system PRO 100 is technologically ready to provide national processing in the near future. We estimate it will take a couple of months, as key Russian banks, that account for more than 40 percent of the market, are already linked to the PRO 100 payment system," Andrey Nesterov, director of corporate communications at the Universal Electronic Card told RT.
Launched as a pilot in 2010, the project Universal electronic card provides for settlements of government, municipal and commercial services via Internet and self-service machines. The card's electronic banking application is based on the payment system 'Universal electronic card', which has a logo PRO 100.
Four Russian banks are technically ready to use the Russian payment system—Sberbank, Uralsib, AK BARS and Moscow Industrial Bank. Full story: rt.com
Comment: The Jewish Money Power is putting 'the squeeze' on Russia KNOWING it will squeeze the US dollar.
Six Reasons Why Simon Peter was not a Pope
By Don Elmore © 2013 all rights reserved
Adolph von Harnack, the famous church historian, wrote an extensive seven-volume work titled "The History of Dogma." Concerning the region of Samaria where Simon Magus had his start he says: "Long before the appearance of Christianity, combinations of religion had taken place in Syria and Palestine, especially in Samaria, in so far as Assyrian and Babylonian religious philosophy . . . with its manifold interpretations, had penetrated to the eastern shore of the Mediterranean" (Volume 1, p. 243-244). The people living in this region believed the Babylonian religion, for they were Babylonians whose forebears had been transported and resettled by the Assyrian Empire. These Babylonian/Lebanese/Syrian/Samaritans had amalgamated their Babylonian beliefs with certain Old Testament teachings but overall they never departed from their own Babylonian trinitarian religious teachings. Do you see why God, through Luke in Acts 8:5-15 warns believers of Simon Magus and the Samaritans? He was never a part of the Church of God but he and his followers have introduced a universal religion, a pagan amalgam of Christianity—called Catholicism! Repent! Don't get me wrong. I love true believers. I have the greatest respect for those who say "the truth always comes out in the end". Pass
it on . . . please send this article to someone you know
Simon Magus' plan was to blend Babylonian and Christian philosophies into a universal counterfeit church and "Proclaim a doctrine in which the Jewish Temple worship with its high priest was incorporated along with some Greek elements. This wild syncretism, or the melding of religions, was a universal religion which gained adherents for Simon."
How like the strategy of the Judaeo-Roman church since Vatican II. From 1962 Rome adopted liberal positions which had been those of the Freemasons for two hundred and fifty years. Through influence of [Jewish] Cardinal Augustin Bea, the Freemasons obtained the Decree on Religious Liberty and applauded the victory of false ecumenism and of collegiality. They were assured of the arrival of democracy in the church, and through that, little by little, the realization of a universal religion; Jewish Pope Paul VI surpassed their expectation. Their true aim is to construct society on a new basis without our Lord Jesus Christ, to arrive at a worldwide religion by the principle of democracy (which gave birth to this bastard religion at the First Nicaea Council). Pope John Paul II wished the Catholic church to recognize the trilogy: "Religious Liberty, collegiality and ecumenism" and he pursued this ideal throughout his papacy.
In Revelation 13:1-10 the Lord Jesus portrays this scarlet coloured beast of Imperial Rome as a composite of all the evil attributes of the previous three Gentile world empires being transformed into Papal Rome following the bifurcation of empire into five Eastern and five Western nations represented by the iron legs of the image of Nebuchadnezzar's dream (Daniel 2). In this new incarnation Rome's mortal wound was healed. We live in the days of the feet of iron mixed with miry clay as Jewish author Uri Dowbenko wrote, "I think that from the very start John Paul II for whatever reasons has sought after one thing and one thing only. The formation of what now appears to be in his mind, a universal assemblage of Catholics at the core; grouped with them Protestant denominations, sects and churches; grouped around them believing Jews, believing Muslims, believing Hindus, believing Buddhists. And that would be a universal religious assembly that could have a powerful dynamic kick in civilization and in solving the problems of men and women today. That is the only thing you can really say this man has sought heart and soul and body with all his traveling. . ." (Uri Dowbenko, Bushwhacked: Inside Stories of True Conspiracy, ISBN 0971004218, p. 213). The "powerful dynamic kick" is an unintended but not inappropriate pun as the Judaeo-Roman church is uniting the physical and spiritual Serpent's seed in the feet of iron mixed with miry clay through the Jewish Rockefellers' World Council of Churches "to make war with the saints and to overcome them: and authority will be given to Rome's Devil-incarnate pope over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations . . . as it was in the days of Noah" (Revelation 13:7; Genesis 6:1-4; Matthew 24:37).
Simon Magus is called the "father of heresy." He brought the Babylonian and Christian ideas and practices together: "The author, or first representative of
this baptized heathenism, according to the uniform testimony of Christian antiquity, is Simon Magus, who unquestionably adulterated Christianity with pagan ideas and practices."
The Catholics [Universalists] claim that Simon Peter, an Apostle of Jesus Christ, was the first Pope of the Catholic church; but Simon Peter was never in Rome. However there was another Simon and he was of the Babylonian religion; he lived in Samaria and was opposed to what Simon Peter believed. When one understands that "Peter" also means "interpreter" one understands that Simon Magus was also known as Simon Peter, or Simon the Interpreter.
Here are six of the many Biblical reasons why Peter was not the Pope of Rome. Any one these six disproves the Judaeo-Roman Catholic claim:
1). Simon Peter's apostleship was to the CIRCUMCISED, that is to the Israelites, NOT TO THE UNCIRCUMCISED Gentiles. Galatians 2:7-9, "But, on the contrary, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me [Paul], as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter (for He that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty is me toward the Gentiles), and when James, Cephas [Peter], and John, who seem to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship, that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision".
According to II Timothy 1:11, the Apostle Paul was "appointed a preacher, and an apostle, and teacher of the Gentiles." Nowhere is Peter mentioned as being the Apostle to the Gentiles, and this would preclude his transfer to Rome to become the head of a Gentile community.
2). Judaeo-Catholic historians tell us that Simon Peter went to Rome in AD45 during the reign of Claudius Caesar in order to thwart the evils of Simon Magus. And after successfully combating the Magus, they continue the deception by claiming that Peter remained as the bishop of Roman until AD68 when he was supposedly crucified upside down on Vatican hill and buried in a pagan cemetery. Catholic historians would have us believe that Peter established their church in AD45. This is merely an assumption not an historical fact for the truth is that neither Peter nor Paul established the Catholic Church. The Gospel had been taken to Rome in about AD36 by the apostles Junius and Andronicus (Romans 16:7), and the work flourished there for several years until the constant altercations of Jews amongst themselves caused Emperor Claudius to expel them from Rome, and with them Israelites who were among the elders. As the period of banishment lasted for 13 years, the founders, Junius and Andronicus, did not come back until AD54. Consequently there would is possibility that Peter could have relocated to or exercised headship over any Church at Rome during this period.
3). During his two years under house arrest in Rome, Paul wrote Epistles to the Ephesians, the Philippians, the Colossians, Philemon, and the Hebrews. According to Roman Catholic historians Paul had been in Rome for over 20 years, and while he mentions others as being in Rome during that period Paul nowhere mentions Peter; not once does he mention the Pope!
4). After his two years imprisonment Paul was released, but about four years later (AD65) he returned to Rome once more a prisoner. This time to appear before the throne of Caesar where he was sentenced to death. II Timothy 4:16, "At my first defense no man stood with me, but all men forsook me: I pray God that it may not be laid to their charge".
It the Roman Catholics read this verse in their churches it would mean that Peter forsook Paul, for they believe that Peter was very much present at Rome during the time of Paul's trial.
5). Where does the Bible say Peter was through these years? These Biblical highlights identify Peter's whereabouts:
About AD35 Peter visited Caesarea with Cornelius, a centurian of the Italian band," and non-Semitic Gentile proselyte to Yahwism prior to his conversion (Acts 10:2).
In AD45 Peter was cast into prison at Jerusalem (Acts 12:3-4).
In AD49 Peter was still in Jerusalem, where he was attending the Jerusalem council (Acts 15).
About AD51 Peter was in Antioch of Syria where he was reprimanded by Paul because he would not eat at table with the Gentiles. It is not strange that the "Roman Pope" would have nothing to do with the Gentiles (Galatians 2:11-21).
About AD66 Peter was in the city of Babylon which was the centre of Judahite population and scholarship from the Captivity until about AD1200
(I Peter 5:13).
This chronology negates the Roman Catholic church's main belief that since Jesus Christ ascended into Heaven, the Pope has succeeded Him on earth. But if Simon Peter, the recipient to the "keys of the kingdom" was not in Rome, then any claim that the Pope is the successor of Jesus Christ is void. He is not the Vicar of Christ and the Roman Catholic church is exposed as usurping the Holy Spirit and her religion a counterfeit of Christianity. Fancy the virgin-born for Jesus sending a sin-born human substitute or Vicar rather than His omniscient, omnipotent, Holy Spirit to the elect of every nation, tribe and tongue of Adam's race!
6). The Judaeo-Roman church claims Peter gave it the keys of the gates of heaven and that no one will enter God's Presence unless that church opens the gates. The word "cardinal" means "hinge" and Rome's Cardinals are the hinges on which the gate—the Pope—is able to turn. But like the word "Trinity," the words "cardinal" and "Pope" are missing from the Bible. Whence did the Roman church contrive this religious pot-pourri that has Peter giving the keys to the church? The Bible has him turning the keys once to unlock the new birth to the Israelites, once again to unlock the Kingdom of heaven to the Samaritans, and a third time to open the door of faith for us Gentiles. Thereafter every saint has the keys to the kingdom of Heaven to pass the Life through the Body.
From Imperial times Rome has been the headquarters of pagan religion. "Where Satan's throne is" (Revelation 2:13). When Babylon fell to the Medes and Persians, the priest-king, Attalus fled the city and went to Pergamum with his priests and sacred mysteries. There he set up his kingdom outside the Roman Empire, and thrived under the care of the Devil. It was the chief oracle of the world. A succession of priest kings followed Attalus until the reign of Attalus III who died without heir and willed his kingdom to Rome. Julius Caesar took both the kingdom physical and spiritual for in 63BC he became Pontiff Maximus of the Babylonish religion and was therefore priest-king. This title passed on to the following emperors until the time of Gratian who refused it and determined first and foremost to be an orthodox Christian Emperor. In AD440 Pope Leo I took the headship the emperor had rejected and today there is still a pontiff in the world, and he is truly Pontiff Maximus.
The New York Catechism says: "The Popes take the place of Jesus Christ on earth. By divine right, the Pope has supreme and full power in faith and morals over each and every pastor and his flock. He is the true Vicar of Christ, the Head of the entire church, the father and teacher of all Christians. He is the infallible ruler, the founder of dogmas, the author of and the judge of councils, the universal ruler of truth, the arbiter of the world, the supreme judge of heaven and earth, the judge of all, being judged by no one, God Himself on earth".
This is based on the fact: "The Catholic church teaches that our Lord conferred on St. Peter the first place of honor and jurisdiction in the government of His whole Church and that the same spiritual supremacy has always resided in the Popes or Bishops of Rome as being the successors of St. Peter. Consequently, to be true followers of Christ all Christians, both among the clergy and laity, must be in communion with the See of Rome where Peter rules in the person of his successors" (Cardinal Gibbons, Faith of Our Fathers).
One of these gods in Rome was called Janus or Pater or Peter. Originally Janus was an ancient prince who reigned in the infancy of the world. He brought men from a rude and savage life to a mild and rational system. He was the first to build cities and the first to establish government over men. After his death, he was deified. This was Cain before, and Nimrod after Noah's flood.
Janus is pictured as being double-faced. This was a symbol of his endeavor to change men from barbarism to civilization. One of Janus' roles, after his deification as a god, was the continuation of his sacred task of "civilizing" men. Janus was to the ancient Romans the "keeper of the gates of heaven and earth." He is represented with a key in one hand as emblematic of his presiding over gates and highways. Janus' face is double to denote his equal empire over the heavens and the earth. And that all things are open and shut to him at his will. That he governs the universe and alone possesses the power of making the world revolve on its axis; that he presides over the gates of heaven.
The Pope claims that same power today. He is said to be infallible and answers to no one for his actions, for he has the keys given to him by Peter. In fact, Janus also controlled the calendar by his priest. The early Roman calendar had just ten months, beginning with March. January and February were added in about 713BC and in 450BC JANU[S]ARY, which was named after him to show his control over the years, was designated the first month of the year. The Catholic church like the priests of Janus feels it has this same authority over the calendar today.
This mixture of paganism with Christianity continues semper eadem in the Judaeo-Roman church. The Catholic church had accepted the pagan festivals of Christ's Mass (Saturnalia), Easter and a host of other rituals and beliefs. They claim they sit in Peter's Chair and that the chief temple of the world is today called Saint Peter's. The church has accepted the practices and symbols of the oldest pagan religion on earth: Peter-worship, well known to the Pagans initiated in the Chaldean Mysteries—the religion of Cain and Nimrod with all of its symbols of obelisks and sun rays as recorded in the Ante-Nicene Fathers, the Nicene Fathers, Post Nicene Fathers, Alexander Hislops' The Two Babylons, p. 208; etc.
This was Satan's attempt to smother God's true religion with a counterfeit that to the untrained eye looks genuine. He did this principally through Simon Magus who amalgamated all the pagan religions into this false UNIVERSAL religion and called the system "Christianity."
We have the record of history which tells us that Simon's teaching spread like wildfire—especially in Rome where he was honored as a "god." After his going to Rome, he made that city his headquarters. While many of them were called Simonians and Samaritans in the first several centuries, they eventually took on the name of "Christians."
It is also true that not all of the members of this Universalist (Catholic) church accepted all of Simon Magus' doctrines of images, pictures, incantations, rituals, traditions, etc., but the bars were let down completely at the First Nicaea Council of AD325 where the rump of the First Church of Rome that apostatized in the first century further cemented her adultery against the Word, her espoused Husband, and organized in union with the Roman State to establish the Judaeo-Roman Universal Church and has since adopted more and more paganism.
Did the few Catholic people of the 4th century who abhorred outright idolatry manage to persuade the masses to yield and turn away from the Simonians (now called Christians) who were the cause of it all? It was the Simonian "Christians" who won out, and imagery, idolatry and paganism became a regular part of the rituals. No wonder Jesus and His disciples lived in Galilee separated to the North of these idolaters in:
Nothing ever gets solved
The old platitude is wrong
— the truth NEVER comes out in the endBy John Kaminski © 2013 all rights reserved
The trouble is, it doesn't. In fact, it's more accurate to say "the truth never comes out in the end".
How many examples do you need?
9/11 is the big contemporary example. Sure, lots of people claim to know that 9/11—I'm talking about the disaster in New York City that killed so many people back in 2001—was an Israeli generated false flag hoax for the purpose of defaming Muslims and opening the floodgates of perpetual war.
Yet, officialdom—the level of governments and newspapers and the general public's perception of things—still runs along as if the official version of the 9/11 caper was a true story, and that Muslim terrorists hiding in caves in Afghanistan who couldn't fly Piper Cubs mastered the controls of complex jetliners and did the dastardly deed. This mindlocked pseudoreality also claims Obama bin Laden was murdered recently and buried at sea by a team of Navy Seals who shortly thereafter were killed in a 'tragic and unanticipated accident', etc. etc.
All of the material proving this continuing soap opera of disasters was a hoax has been conveniently ignored, shunted aside as the ravings of conspiracy crackpots, and our children are forced to digest these government lies in school as the official version of events. They may not to be refuted, challenged, or debunked, lest you be considered mentally deranged and afflicted with a certifiable case of Oppositional Defiance Disorder (ODD), an imaginary malady fabricated by wacked-out psychiatrists which is now all the rage in allopathic medical care circles—call it Obamacare circles, if you like.
The fact that ODD is a totally fake disease meant to boost the sales of antipsychotic drugs that don't work won't be anything that will keep you of jail and on forced medications, however, should the powers that be determine that the truth you are telling is too dangerous to be allowed to be heard by all the other patients of the American psycho ward now swilling down Prozac and other recommended sleep aids.
What is more likely to happen should you begin to uncontrollably sputter facts that are at odds with the evil but well paid spin masters who appear on the big screen is that you will be laughed out of the room by the collection of paid shills who will muster all sorts of manufactured facts to prove you're an anti-social nutcase unworthy of being listened to. If that doesn't work, you'll be fired from your job and widely castigated as a deranged misanthrope anathema to polite social circles.
And if all of those don't work, you'll die in a mysterious plane crash like Beverly Eckert (a 9/11 widow) and that will be the end of it—and you.
I mean, just think about the great conundrums of our time, and throughout history, really. None of them have ever really been solved.
The event most resembling 9/11 in the category of phony descriptions of events that have been allowed to stand across time is of course the JFK assassination. Despite hundreds of experts assigning blame among Lyndon Johnson, the Mossad, the mob and George H. W. Bush, the official government lone nut Lee Harvey Oswald theory still holds sway amid the insincere skyscrapers of mainstream propaganda.
In other words, the truth has never officially come out.
And ditto with the assassinations of Bobby Kennedy and Martin Luther King in 1968. RFK was shot from behind by his bodyguard and MLK was downed by an Army hit team, which a court case actually confirmed. But officially, among mainstream urban legends, Sirhan Sirhan and James Earl Ray were the patsies who got convicted. And the truth has never officially come out.
There are a phenomenal number of political assassinations with long celebrated mainstream fantasies covering up hidden stories that could be itemized, such as the clumsy murder of Princess Diana, but generally speaking, the truth that never comes out generally exists in two main categories. These include the politically fabricated causes of wars and the complexly crafted secrets of false flag atrocities. Most often the two categories are closely related.
One need only remember the crass hoopla surrounding Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. Despite the very real mass murder of 2 million Iraqis, former president George W. Bush was able to make jokes about the deception at fashionable Washington press dinners.
So at this late date, everybody's in on the joke—it's now acceptable for Americans to laugh at the collateral damage murder of innocent people in faraway places, although they're not laughing so much at the calculated destruction of their own country by Jewish bankers on Wall Street who daily demonstrate the same regard for the American people as they have for Afghan wedding parties.
All the wars of history are betrayed as phony operations by the events of the Gulf of Tonkin (Vietnam), Pearl Harbor (World War II) and the Lusitania (World War I).
Even after a hundred years, the truth has never come out.
So all of those people who wave away your concerns about your continuing health—not to mention the forecasts of your rapidly shrinking longevity—by saying "oh, don't worry, the truth always comes out in the end", need to suddenly realize that they're talking smack through the wrong orifice, because, in fact, the truth never comes out, and our lives are all in serious jeopardy because of this attitude.
Just consider what's happening today. The truth has never come out about the poisoning of the Gulf of Mexico. It has never been approached regarding the irradiation of the world by the disaster at Fukushima. We still have no firm idea about how the HAARP array in Alaska can precisely steer hurricanes and tear up the shore of New Jersey. Or cause earthquakes on demand on the campus of Cal State Northridge.
Take it right up to the present day. Lt. Paul Vance orders us to not question the police story about Sandy Hook, the world is gripped by the throat with the story of 20 murdered children, and all of sudden there are all these questions about whether this event ever really happened. Why are we not allowed to talk about it? Why were there no pictures of the crime scene? Why is every detail about this horrid story subject to second guessing?
And switching ever so slightly to the twin atrocity alleged to have happened on the streets of Boston, what is the truth of a young man whose heart appears to have been cut out of his chest while he was laying in the street, or his brother whose throat was cut while he was hiding in a boat in someone's backyard, while armed stormtroopers from multiple police agencies sealed off a whole town and barged into people's homes in a frenzied search for two brothers who were declared guilty without a trial.
And then a friend of theirs who was suddenly murdered by the FBI with no adequate explanation. Will the truth about these things ever come out?
You know the answer to all these questions, which are all the same question. And you know the answer is . . . not a snowball's chance in Hades!
And then the next question that always lurks in the dark part of your own mind threatens to burst open your skull, because it's a question you dare not even ask never mind answer.
Are you in control of your own life?
The imposition of officially sanctioned phony explanations for either assassinations, wars or strategic demolition jobs creates in the befuddled population a permanent state of cognitive dissonance where no one can make a decision about anything. In this way the tyranny is allowed to continue unabated and with renewed vigor that enables the perps to continue terrorizing everyone into the babbling insanity of terrified isolation . . .
Knowing full well that on the day they come for you, the truth will never come out.
Comment: "Oh, God, do you realize that every word we say, scientifically proven, it's on a record [television proves that]; it starts when we start living in this earth, and it ends when we die, and it's put in God's album to be played back again at the judgment? How are we going to escape it, the damnation of God, if the thing has been made so clear before us and yet we turn it down. Oh, dear God, these words never die; they go on and on. The record will be played at the day of the judgment" (William Branham, Things that are to be, p. 43:144a). nl831.htm
Brother Grigor-Scott is a
non-denominational minister who has ministered full-time since 1981, primarily
to other ministers and their congregations overseas. He pastors Bible Believers' tiny congregation, and is available to teach in your church.
Bible Believers' Church
Currabubula NSW
Australia 2342
e-mail Bible Believers URL Bible Believers' Website
PowerPoint presentation The Second Coming of Christ
Subscribe to Newsletter Unsubscribe from Newsletter
No comments:
Post a Comment