Bible Believers' Newsletter 896
"We focus on the
present Truth – what Jesus is doing now. .
."
ISSN 1442-8660
ISSN 1442-8660
Christian greetings in
the precious Name of our Lord Jesus Christ, may He bless you in the revelation
of His Word as you study to prove all things.
"Variation of a Theme: Presentation of the H.-Hypothesis from 1900 to 2006" is presented for your edification by first-time contributing author Dr. Günter Kümel. His interesting essay precedes our main article, "All Israel is not of Israel," an essential fact and revelation everyone should understand.
This Newsletter serves those of like precious faith. Whoever will receive the truth is welcome to feed their soul from the waters of the River of Life. Everything here presented should be confirmed personally in your own Bible.
"Variation of a Theme: Presentation of the H.-Hypothesis from 1900 to 2006" is presented for your edification by first-time contributing author Dr. Günter Kümel. His interesting essay precedes our main article, "All Israel is not of Israel," an essential fact and revelation everyone should understand.
This Newsletter serves those of like precious faith. Whoever will receive the truth is welcome to feed their soul from the waters of the River of Life. Everything here presented should be confirmed personally in your own Bible.
Your brother-in-Christ
Anthony Grigor-Scott
Anthony Grigor-Scott
Is this Ground Zero?
September 11, 2015 —
The WTC was constructed as a ritual sacrifice [to] globalism and chaos. In
case you don't know, the full gamut of media widely promoted this event in movies, commercials, comic books,
documents. [See 356, 675, 745 and 777]. Points of explosions
and extent of the damage were specified, cycle through images in the:
Full story: Swiadomosc
Full story: Swiadomosc
Israel Warplanes strike near Syria Airport
November 11, 2015 —
Syria says Israel and its Western and regional allies are aiding Takfiri
militant groups operating inside the Arab country. The Syrian army has
repeatedly seized huge quantities of Israeli-made weapons and advanced military
equipment from the foreign-backed militants inside Syria. The Tel Aviv regime
has a long history of supporting militant groups against the government of
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad over the past few years of turmoil in the Arab
country . . . Full story: presstv.com
Comment: During a visit to the US this week, Netanyahu gave insight into Israel's Syria policy . . . "We will not allow Iran to set up a second front in the Golan, and we will act forcefully—and have acted forcefully—to prevent that. We will not allow the use of Syrian territory from which we'd be attacked by the Syrian army or anyone else and we have acted forcefully against that. And third, we will not allow the use of Syrian territory for the transfer of game-changing weapons into Lebanon into Hezbollah's hands, and we have acted forcefully on that . . . " (Ruth Blum, Algemeiner, November 12, 2015).
This report begs the question as to the ultimate objective of Netanyahu's visit to Washington . . . Was there an understanding that Israel would henceforth play a more active role in the war against Syria? Meanwhile, a US Apache helicopter escorts convoy of ISIS into Syria youtube.com
Comment: During a visit to the US this week, Netanyahu gave insight into Israel's Syria policy . . . "We will not allow Iran to set up a second front in the Golan, and we will act forcefully—and have acted forcefully—to prevent that. We will not allow the use of Syrian territory from which we'd be attacked by the Syrian army or anyone else and we have acted forcefully against that. And third, we will not allow the use of Syrian territory for the transfer of game-changing weapons into Lebanon into Hezbollah's hands, and we have acted forcefully on that . . . " (Ruth Blum, Algemeiner, November 12, 2015).
This report begs the question as to the ultimate objective of Netanyahu's visit to Washington . . . Was there an understanding that Israel would henceforth play a more active role in the war against Syria? Meanwhile, a US Apache helicopter escorts convoy of ISIS into Syria youtube.com
EU refuses to recognise Israeli Sovereignty over Occupied West Bank, Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem, Syrian Golan
November 12 2015 —
European
Union refuses to recognize Israeli sovereignty over Occupied Palestinian West
Bank, Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem or the Syrian Golan Heights. Consequently,
all 500,000 illegal settlers should be repatriated back to Israel. Full
story: globalresearch.ca
Pentagon Expert: Russians would 'Annihilate' US Army on Battlefield
November 11, 2015 —
Despite the size of its military budget, the US Army isn't as strong as one
might think it is and it would certainly lose to the Russian Army in a direct
confrontation on a battlefield, retired US Army Colonel Douglas Macgregor said,
according to Politico Magazine . . . when it comes to fighting wars [the
Russians] are second to none.
Macgregor is a famous US war hero whose squadron destroyed an entire Iraqi Armored Brigade in 23 minutes, while suffering only one casualty, at the Battle of 73 Easting, a decisive tank fight during the Gulf War. Later, reflecting on his famous victory, Macgregor said that if his military unit came to a face-to-face . . . with the Russians, his army would have been defeated. "Defeated isn't the right word, the right word is annihilated" . . .
During his presentation at the US Congress in November of 2013, Macgregor compared the state of the US Army to a nine-passenger rowboat, in which "four would steer, three would call cadence and two would man the oars," according to Politico.
"Even if you increased the Army to 600,000 in its current form… it would still fail. That's the problem and, by the way, the Army knows it," the US military expert said . . . Full story: renegadetribune.com
Comment: Jesus Christ and His Prophet William Branham concur. Israel will be utterly defeated and the United States will be defeated, invaded, and briefly occupied.
The drums of the phony war are beating more loudly; without warning just after sunset last Saturday night: the US Navy purposely picked a time to launch an unarmed Trident II missile from the submarine the USS Kentucky from waters off the Southern California coast so hundreds of thousands of witnesses would be sure to observe the brightly lit up sky and headlines would certainly spread around the world: a direct provocation against Russia and China.
Thursday Russia served a propaganda leak on state TV, a giant torpedo that would create "wide areas of radioactive contamination" as General Douglas MacArthur proposed to encircle China with cobalt after World War II.
On November 8, the Wall Street Journal headlined "US Military Officials Aim to Bolster Troop Presence in Europe"—to deter a nonexistent Russian threat. Pentagon commanders "proposed sending more forces into Europe on a rotating basis to build up the American presence and are stepping up training exercises to counter potential Russian interference with troop transfers in the event of a crisis with Moscow," said the Journal.
The Jewish banksters of the City of London always control both sides of the Hegelian dialectic in any major conflict, and NATO and the US are FORCING Russia back under Judaeo-Communism. Even though it was announced in the UN in 1953, Jewish-controlled Goyim in the West do not realize they are puppets and "human cattle" to be culled when they get out of hand. They fail to see that Jewish German Chancellor Frau. Merkel arranged the invasion and occupation of Germany and Western Europe according to Jewish plans announced long ago by rabbis Emanuel Rabinovich at the Council of European Rabbis in Budapest, Hungary, in 1952 and Israel Cohen "A Racial-Program for the 20th Century" quoted by Congressman Abernathy in the Congressional Record, 1957, p. 8,559. See: "The First Time I heard of Barack" and Matthew 24:37).
Macgregor is a famous US war hero whose squadron destroyed an entire Iraqi Armored Brigade in 23 minutes, while suffering only one casualty, at the Battle of 73 Easting, a decisive tank fight during the Gulf War. Later, reflecting on his famous victory, Macgregor said that if his military unit came to a face-to-face . . . with the Russians, his army would have been defeated. "Defeated isn't the right word, the right word is annihilated" . . .
During his presentation at the US Congress in November of 2013, Macgregor compared the state of the US Army to a nine-passenger rowboat, in which "four would steer, three would call cadence and two would man the oars," according to Politico.
"Even if you increased the Army to 600,000 in its current form… it would still fail. That's the problem and, by the way, the Army knows it," the US military expert said . . . Full story: renegadetribune.com
Comment: Jesus Christ and His Prophet William Branham concur. Israel will be utterly defeated and the United States will be defeated, invaded, and briefly occupied.
The drums of the phony war are beating more loudly; without warning just after sunset last Saturday night: the US Navy purposely picked a time to launch an unarmed Trident II missile from the submarine the USS Kentucky from waters off the Southern California coast so hundreds of thousands of witnesses would be sure to observe the brightly lit up sky and headlines would certainly spread around the world: a direct provocation against Russia and China.
Thursday Russia served a propaganda leak on state TV, a giant torpedo that would create "wide areas of radioactive contamination" as General Douglas MacArthur proposed to encircle China with cobalt after World War II.
On November 8, the Wall Street Journal headlined "US Military Officials Aim to Bolster Troop Presence in Europe"—to deter a nonexistent Russian threat. Pentagon commanders "proposed sending more forces into Europe on a rotating basis to build up the American presence and are stepping up training exercises to counter potential Russian interference with troop transfers in the event of a crisis with Moscow," said the Journal.
The Jewish banksters of the City of London always control both sides of the Hegelian dialectic in any major conflict, and NATO and the US are FORCING Russia back under Judaeo-Communism. Even though it was announced in the UN in 1953, Jewish-controlled Goyim in the West do not realize they are puppets and "human cattle" to be culled when they get out of hand. They fail to see that Jewish German Chancellor Frau. Merkel arranged the invasion and occupation of Germany and Western Europe according to Jewish plans announced long ago by rabbis Emanuel Rabinovich at the Council of European Rabbis in Budapest, Hungary, in 1952 and Israel Cohen "A Racial-Program for the 20th Century" quoted by Congressman Abernathy in the Congressional Record, 1957, p. 8,559. See: "The First Time I heard of Barack" and Matthew 24:37).
With open Gates: the forced Collective Suicide of European Nations
November 9, 2015 —
At current immigration levels and disappearing birth rates native Europeans
are destined to become a minority in their own countries within decades. This is
already the case for many of Europe's largest cities. Europeans have effectively
lost their right to exist as cultures and nations in their own homelands and are
facing extinction. Millions of young Muslim men leave behind their family, pay
thousands to criminal traffickers to reach the land they have been promised by
European politicians illegally.
Dubbed by the media as "refugees," they cross through 6-10 safe countries to reach wealthy nations like Germany or Sweden where they hope to receive a better life at the expense of the taxpayer. Only a fraction of them are Syrian, as they enter unfiltered, without any documents and without any legitimate right to claim asylum. Women and children are rarely seen, except in the cherry-picked sob stories of the media.
Any indigenous resistance of Europeans who refuse to hand over the countries of their ancestors to often radical and criminal Muslim foreigners is labeled "hateful," "racist," even "Nazi." The level of cultural, moral and political subversion with egalitarian and Marxist ideologies has reached levels the KGB would never have dreamed of. Equality and tolerance are lies that serve none but a few.
The Left, mainly orchestrated by Zionist interests, is destroying our countries from the inside. Patriotism, the most basic and fundamental trait of any nation that wants to survive has become something to be ashamed of.
Feminism has destroyed family values and birth rates. Healthy nationalism has been replaced with a culture of guilt, self-hatred, apathy, degeneracy and pathological altruism. We are told to embrace "diversity," in reality this simply means instead of just being a global minority, Europeans are supposed to become a minority in their own countries as well. No civilized society can keep up with the birth rate of third world immigrants, especially when the main goal is integration rather than assimilation. Parallel societies breed poverty, crime and radicalism.
Multiculturalism has never, at any time in human history, worked anywhere. If you believe otherwise, you're delusional. In fact it's the primary reason for every major conflict.
The crimes committed by the EU against the European peoples are directly in violation of the 1948 UN genocide convention, Article II: (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Because of this injustice, far-right parties everywhere in Europe are gaining astonishing amounts of support, becoming the biggest parties in some countries.
Any European that does not rise up to defend his country from foreign invasion because he's too scared of words does not deserve it.
We are still at a point where you will not get imprisoned for your political opinion in most European countries, but this will change very soon. Do not be apathetic, do not be weak. Be someone that can be proud to call himself European.
Full story: youtube.com
Comment: Contiguous states in Africa and the Middle East combined with European countries in the South and East of the continent are bearing the brunt of the migrant flows which are ongoing. The racism and xenophobia inherited from the collapse of socialism in the COMECON sector is illustrated through the hatred, brutality and marginalization of the hundreds of thousands flooding into Europe and the millions who are destined to come.
At present the US Africa Command (AFRICOM) is escalating its deployments across the continent through direct intervention and partnerships with individual states and regional organizations. Emboldened by its operations in Libya, Tunisia and Egypt, imperialism is spreading its tentacles deeper into the continent.
An AFRICOM base in the Horn of Africa nation of Djibouti at Camp Lemonier is being refurbished for the expanding mission involving thousands of Pentagon troops. Airstrips are being constructed in West, Central and Eastern Africa to ostensibly assist African Union member-states in the global fight against "terrorism."
Efforts aimed at the creation of an African Standby Force (ASF), which was first advanced by Pan-Africanist and Socialist leader of Ghana, Dr. Kwame Nkrumah in the early 1960s, and later by Col. Muammar Gaddafi in the 2000s, have now been realized absent of its revolutionary orientation. Recent exercises for the ASF in South Africa has prompted articles even within the bourgeois press noting the dependent character of such operations which are relying upon funding from the Pentagon and their European Union (EU) allies in NATO.
Any continental military force aimed at fostering peace and stability in Africa must be independent of imperialism both politically and economically. Otherwise such efforts will serve as an appendage of the Pentagon-NATO forces and consequently serving the interests of neo-colonialism as opposed to anti-imperialism and the much needed socialist future. globalresearch.ca
And the scum of earth's ignorant failures rush through the gates of apostate Europe. "[It is] a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God" (Hebrews 10:31).
Dubbed by the media as "refugees," they cross through 6-10 safe countries to reach wealthy nations like Germany or Sweden where they hope to receive a better life at the expense of the taxpayer. Only a fraction of them are Syrian, as they enter unfiltered, without any documents and without any legitimate right to claim asylum. Women and children are rarely seen, except in the cherry-picked sob stories of the media.
Any indigenous resistance of Europeans who refuse to hand over the countries of their ancestors to often radical and criminal Muslim foreigners is labeled "hateful," "racist," even "Nazi." The level of cultural, moral and political subversion with egalitarian and Marxist ideologies has reached levels the KGB would never have dreamed of. Equality and tolerance are lies that serve none but a few.
The Left, mainly orchestrated by Zionist interests, is destroying our countries from the inside. Patriotism, the most basic and fundamental trait of any nation that wants to survive has become something to be ashamed of.
Feminism has destroyed family values and birth rates. Healthy nationalism has been replaced with a culture of guilt, self-hatred, apathy, degeneracy and pathological altruism. We are told to embrace "diversity," in reality this simply means instead of just being a global minority, Europeans are supposed to become a minority in their own countries as well. No civilized society can keep up with the birth rate of third world immigrants, especially when the main goal is integration rather than assimilation. Parallel societies breed poverty, crime and radicalism.
Multiculturalism has never, at any time in human history, worked anywhere. If you believe otherwise, you're delusional. In fact it's the primary reason for every major conflict.
The crimes committed by the EU against the European peoples are directly in violation of the 1948 UN genocide convention, Article II: (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Because of this injustice, far-right parties everywhere in Europe are gaining astonishing amounts of support, becoming the biggest parties in some countries.
Any European that does not rise up to defend his country from foreign invasion because he's too scared of words does not deserve it.
We are still at a point where you will not get imprisoned for your political opinion in most European countries, but this will change very soon. Do not be apathetic, do not be weak. Be someone that can be proud to call himself European.
Full story: youtube.com
Comment: Contiguous states in Africa and the Middle East combined with European countries in the South and East of the continent are bearing the brunt of the migrant flows which are ongoing. The racism and xenophobia inherited from the collapse of socialism in the COMECON sector is illustrated through the hatred, brutality and marginalization of the hundreds of thousands flooding into Europe and the millions who are destined to come.
At present the US Africa Command (AFRICOM) is escalating its deployments across the continent through direct intervention and partnerships with individual states and regional organizations. Emboldened by its operations in Libya, Tunisia and Egypt, imperialism is spreading its tentacles deeper into the continent.
An AFRICOM base in the Horn of Africa nation of Djibouti at Camp Lemonier is being refurbished for the expanding mission involving thousands of Pentagon troops. Airstrips are being constructed in West, Central and Eastern Africa to ostensibly assist African Union member-states in the global fight against "terrorism."
Efforts aimed at the creation of an African Standby Force (ASF), which was first advanced by Pan-Africanist and Socialist leader of Ghana, Dr. Kwame Nkrumah in the early 1960s, and later by Col. Muammar Gaddafi in the 2000s, have now been realized absent of its revolutionary orientation. Recent exercises for the ASF in South Africa has prompted articles even within the bourgeois press noting the dependent character of such operations which are relying upon funding from the Pentagon and their European Union (EU) allies in NATO.
Any continental military force aimed at fostering peace and stability in Africa must be independent of imperialism both politically and economically. Otherwise such efforts will serve as an appendage of the Pentagon-NATO forces and consequently serving the interests of neo-colonialism as opposed to anti-imperialism and the much needed socialist future. globalresearch.ca
And the scum of earth's ignorant failures rush through the gates of apostate Europe. "[It is] a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God" (Hebrews 10:31).
The Flood of Refugees into Europe: 'The New Slave Trade'
November 8, 2015 —
Individual faces of those poor souls on the run don't count. Small children,
women, old men—thousands and thousands die en route to a 'more decent life';
they are mere statistics, faceless numbers. They are used as weapons to
destabilize, to weaken other nations, to soften them, so to speak, for easier
dominance and digestion of the hungry arrogant, outsized beast, appearing in the
form of the United States of America, but representing a global, Zionist-led
elite, with an intimidating, scary killer army that absorbs more than half of
the world's military budget . . .
Back to the refugees cum new slaves. President Hollande has just announced that French labor laws are to be revised. The sacrosanct 35 hr week is being questioned, among other hard-fought for union gains over the last half a century. This means, future labor contracts may be negotiated directly between workers unions and corporations, without the backing of the government as a regulatory body behind the workers. Hence, deregulating labor laws will be playing directly into the hands of the new arriving labor force in the form of refugees—and into the possible future playing field of the TTIP.
Now you compound all these tentacles of destabilization with the nefarious and secretly negotiated TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership)—which we all hope will not pass in spite of Brussels and thanks to the German public which demonstrates ferociously against it. But if it does pass, with corporations dictating labor laws, unemployment in Europe may increase exponentially with good jobs switching to the US as labor standards are lower there than they are in Europe; and with the TTIP-imposed private corporate courts that would have supremacy over national legislation—if that happens, the continent will be further destabilized. Europe ceases to be the way we know it. It may be reduced to just a geographic land mass. Future generations may be enslaved by globalized corporate power not much different from what the wave of refugees will be—if they, the refugees, stay in Europe. Full story: globalresearch.ca truepublica.org.uk
Comment: The return to serfdom.
Back to the refugees cum new slaves. President Hollande has just announced that French labor laws are to be revised. The sacrosanct 35 hr week is being questioned, among other hard-fought for union gains over the last half a century. This means, future labor contracts may be negotiated directly between workers unions and corporations, without the backing of the government as a regulatory body behind the workers. Hence, deregulating labor laws will be playing directly into the hands of the new arriving labor force in the form of refugees—and into the possible future playing field of the TTIP.
Now you compound all these tentacles of destabilization with the nefarious and secretly negotiated TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership)—which we all hope will not pass in spite of Brussels and thanks to the German public which demonstrates ferociously against it. But if it does pass, with corporations dictating labor laws, unemployment in Europe may increase exponentially with good jobs switching to the US as labor standards are lower there than they are in Europe; and with the TTIP-imposed private corporate courts that would have supremacy over national legislation—if that happens, the continent will be further destabilized. Europe ceases to be the way we know it. It may be reduced to just a geographic land mass. Future generations may be enslaved by globalized corporate power not much different from what the wave of refugees will be—if they, the refugees, stay in Europe. Full story: globalresearch.ca truepublica.org.uk
Comment: The return to serfdom.
Full Text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP)
November 05, 2015 —
The 12-country transnational trade deal has been widely condemned for
privileging corporate profits over international public interests. The secrecy
around the deal and the negotiating process, which gave access to large
corporations but largely locked out civil society, has been criticized as an
assault on democracy.
"The TPP is a disaster for jobs, and environment and our democracy. It is the latest stage in the corporate capture of our society" . . . According to Wikileaks, the TPP text also reveals a "NSA-friendly" provision regarding telecommunications . . . Full story: mfat.govt.nz
"The TPP is a disaster for jobs, and environment and our democracy. It is the latest stage in the corporate capture of our society" . . . According to Wikileaks, the TPP text also reveals a "NSA-friendly" provision regarding telecommunications . . . Full story: mfat.govt.nz
The Poppy Cover-up Book? Bush 41 gets another Free Ride
November 9, 2015 —
From the moment he went to World War II as a naval aviator through
successive stints as oilman, congressman, diplomat, and party official, his
official work masked the fact he was deeply immersed in the spy world. He was
involved with a succession of highly secretive covert operations affecting not
just outcomes in his own country but around the world—from the Bay of Pigs to
coups abroad and scandals and cataclysms at home—including Watergate and Iran
Contra. (To learn more, begin here, Part 1 of a series of 10 excerpts from
Family of Secrets).
Publicly, he said he couldn't recall where he was when John F. Kennedy was shot in Dallas, but I found out. Guess where? Dallas! Guess who he was working for? The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)! Whose longtime director and master coup planner, Allen Dulles, a close friend of the Bush family, had two years earlier been forced out by JFK. Full story: whowhatwhy.org
Comment: Likewise Barack Obama (or whoever he really is) is CIA.
Publicly, he said he couldn't recall where he was when John F. Kennedy was shot in Dallas, but I found out. Guess where? Dallas! Guess who he was working for? The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)! Whose longtime director and master coup planner, Allen Dulles, a close friend of the Bush family, had two years earlier been forced out by JFK. Full story: whowhatwhy.org
Comment: Likewise Barack Obama (or whoever he really is) is CIA.
No Matter how well Russian Media expose Western Lies . . .
November 9, 2015 —
Western media didn't even report—and more than a decade after the fact, they
still are not reporting—that George W. Bush was lying when he said
on 7 September 2002 that the IAEA had just issued a report saying that Saddam
Hussein was six months away from having a nuclear weapon—when he said this even
though the IAEA repeatedly denied having ever issued such a report. (And:
largely because Western media still don't report that he had lied there, the Gallup
Poll, on 20 June 2014, found that former President George W. Bush was
continuing to be well-regarded by the American public: he still had an approval
rating of 53%, and only 44% of Americans disapproved of him . . .
And, more than a decade later, the media are still not reporting that Barack Obama lies saying that the August 2013 sarin gas attack in Syria was from Assad's forces and not from the rebel side—which it actually was. (Obama repeats this lie every time he 'justifies' his invasion of Syria. He's actually supporting the people who did that sarin attack—and he knows it) . . . Full story: globalresearch.ca youtube.com
And, more than a decade later, the media are still not reporting that Barack Obama lies saying that the August 2013 sarin gas attack in Syria was from Assad's forces and not from the rebel side—which it actually was. (Obama repeats this lie every time he 'justifies' his invasion of Syria. He's actually supporting the people who did that sarin attack—and he knows it) . . . Full story: globalresearch.ca youtube.com
The Serpent People return to Ukraine
August 8, 2014 —
From the early centuries of the first millennia, the Khazars of Eastern
Europe were known as the diabolical "Serpent People," and now, the nation of
Israel has admitted that its people are indeed, the Khazars.
The admission by the Israelis that the Jews are not related to ancient Israel but to Khazaria was reported in The Times of Israel (Leaked Report: Israel Acknowledges Jews in fact Khazars; Secret Plan for Reverse Migration to Ukraine, March 18, 2014). That article, by Professor Jim Wald, related that the Israeli leadership in Jerusalem is sending military equipment and settlers from Israel to Ukraine. The Jews have taken charge of that ravaged country's government and finances and intend eventually to make the Ukraine a "second homeland" for the Jews.
Their plan, leaked by governmental insiders, came only after Netanyahu and his cabinet reviewed growing DNA genetic evidence that the Jews are not the descendants of Abraham. Instead, they came from Khazaria, of which Kiev, Ukraine is the centerpiece. In fact, the Jews of Israel and the US are of Ukrainian heritage. Ukraine is in the heartland of Khazaria . . . The Khazars, identified in Revelation 2 and 3 as the wicked "Synagogue of Satan," are further identified in Ezekiel 38 and 39 prophetically as the people of Gog, from the land of Magog. Prophecy clearly tells us that this warlike serpentine people shall invade and conquer Israel first, then go on to plunge the entire planet into chaos and warfare (Revelation 20) . . . Full story: youtube.com youtube.com
Comment: They have invaded and conquered Israel, Zechariah 14:2 prophesies their imminent defeat and mass exodus to allow the Israelites to return to the land of their Covenant.
The admission by the Israelis that the Jews are not related to ancient Israel but to Khazaria was reported in The Times of Israel (Leaked Report: Israel Acknowledges Jews in fact Khazars; Secret Plan for Reverse Migration to Ukraine, March 18, 2014). That article, by Professor Jim Wald, related that the Israeli leadership in Jerusalem is sending military equipment and settlers from Israel to Ukraine. The Jews have taken charge of that ravaged country's government and finances and intend eventually to make the Ukraine a "second homeland" for the Jews.
Their plan, leaked by governmental insiders, came only after Netanyahu and his cabinet reviewed growing DNA genetic evidence that the Jews are not the descendants of Abraham. Instead, they came from Khazaria, of which Kiev, Ukraine is the centerpiece. In fact, the Jews of Israel and the US are of Ukrainian heritage. Ukraine is in the heartland of Khazaria . . . The Khazars, identified in Revelation 2 and 3 as the wicked "Synagogue of Satan," are further identified in Ezekiel 38 and 39 prophetically as the people of Gog, from the land of Magog. Prophecy clearly tells us that this warlike serpentine people shall invade and conquer Israel first, then go on to plunge the entire planet into chaos and warfare (Revelation 20) . . . Full story: youtube.com youtube.com
Comment: They have invaded and conquered Israel, Zechariah 14:2 prophesies their imminent defeat and mass exodus to allow the Israelites to return to the land of their Covenant.
Israel harvesting slain Palestinians' Organs
November 5, 2015 —
The Palestinian ambassador to the United Nations (UN) says the Tel Aviv
regime is harvesting the organs of Palestinians killed in clashes with Israeli
forces in the occupied territories. Riyad Mansour said in a letter to UN
Secretary General Ban Ki-moon on Wednesday that the bodies of the Palestinians
killed by Israeli forces are "returned with missing corneas and other organs,
further confirming past reports about organ harvesting by the occupying power."
"A medical examination conducted on bodies of Palestinians returned after they
were killed by the occupying power found that they were missing organs," Mansour
wrote in the letter. Full story: presstv.com
Comment: Israeli soldiers and police commit murder with impunity. So do extremist settlers.
Comment: Israeli soldiers and police commit murder with impunity. So do extremist settlers.
Variation of a Theme: Presentation of the H.-Hypothesis from 1900 to 2006
By Dr. Günter Kümel
"Do you now believe in
the holocaust, at last?" was the first and only question of a German judge in an
appeal case against a man who had allegedly voiced doubts concerning the
official version of the treatment of convicts in the labour camps. As the
defendant answered evasively, he was immediately sentenced. The rigid laws for
"holocaust denial" in many European states provide terms of imprisonment of up
to twenty years! Recently a German politician (Axel Reitz) was sentenced for two
years for committing the "hate crime" of faithfully quoting passages from the
Talmud.
In many European countries, unprejudiced research into these matters is only possible if the scientist carries out private studies all at his own expense and without any grants from state institutions. In addition he places in jeopardy his freedom, his health, his fortune, his family, and his entire way of life. Attempted murder against revisionists is not an exception and many people that knew too much have died under suspicious circumstances. In spite of this, it is actually a great thing that so many individuals from different countries, backgrounds and education, with widely varying political views and religious beliefs have devoted themselves to this mission.
I owe the information given in this report to the books of Germar Rudolf, Gerd Honsik, Don Heddesheimer, Bruno Montoriol, and to many other authors.
History is supposed to be a science and therefore historical hypotheses are not supposed to be simply "believed" or falsified, but verified by scientific argument. I am a scientist, but I am not a martyr. Therefore I will carefully avoid giving anybody the impression that I might doubt the official version. Rather I wish to present actual facts to you about the history of the presentation of the "holocaust" hypothesis and I hope you will find this to be an interesting, if not indeed, a fascinating article on the subject.
If one examines the various manifestations that the "holocaust" has adopted over the years, one gets a vague and confused picture without solid shape, like a demon emanating from a bottle. We are presented not with one big holocaust but a multitude of widely varying stories, forming a sort of continuum from as early as 1900 almost to the present day.
Elements of the tale of a "holocaust" go back to ancient myths of the Jahwe cult. A prophecy would have it Jahwe would give back "their land" to the followers of this desert tribe religion after the mythical figure of 6 million Jews had lost their lives in fire ovens. The Zionist movement exploited this myth from its earliest days. In 1900, the N.Y. Times reported an address made by Rabbi S. Wise at a Zionist fund raising campaign: "There are 6 million living, bleeding, suffering arguments for Zionism . . ." In 1915, the N.Y. Times knew of " . . . 6 million Jews endangered (by Russia, GK) in the war zone of WWI, who were enduring danger to life, grief and misery . . ." In 1916 a book (published in 25.000 copies) was distributed to the top ranks of public life and the military in the USA entitled, "The Jews in the eastern War Zone." It claimed that the Russians were concentrating 6 million Jews in a sort of huge prison, guarded by an army of corrupt and brute camp guards. In those days the alleged perpetrators changed, but constantly 6 million Jews were the victims. An exception to this rule was the report by the London Daily Telegraph in 1916 which claimed that Austria and Bulgaria had killed some 700,000 Jews in local churches in Serbia by suffocation with poisonous gas and by stabbing. Notably, a nearly identical report was published by the very same newspaper in 1942, "Germans have killed 700,000 Jews in Poland by movable gas chambers, biggest massacre in world history . . ."
In 1919 a really heartbreaking article appeared in a Jewish US newspaper, ". . . 6 million Jewish men and women are whirled towards the grave . . . are dying . . . crying for help, 6 million in the threatened holocaust . . ." Interestingly, the headline of this article contained an antichristian religious connotation: "The crucifixion of Jews . . . must stop!" From 1917 to 1927 a wealth of comparable reports were published in various newspapers, especially in the "New York Times." The readers were informed of the incredible misery and danger to life of mostly 6 million, sometimes four or five million Jews. These campaigns have been seen as motivated by the Balfour Declaration and the necessity to collect money for the realization of the emigration to Palestine. Anti-Jewish persecutions in Poland triggered the dramatic protest of Dr. Joseph Tenenbaum, the chairman of the American Jewish Congress in 1932: "The Jewish people all over the world face a war of extinction . . ."
In 1936 the US Peel Commission had to try to bring peace to Palestine after heavy fighting between Arabs and Jewish militia. Before this commission Chaim Weizmann emphatically declared that ". . . 6 million Jews in Europe had to live "unwanted" and endangered as if detained in a prison . . ." In those days only some 300,000 Jews (5% of the overall figure) lived in Germany.
In 1991, Jewish officials in US newspapers accused Iraq, and Germany of developing a new, and highly effective gas "containing Zyklon-B," to be used in homicidal gas chambers ready "for all Jews," "6 million Jews"; even pictures of these gas chambers were shown: The fourth or fifth "holocaust" in this century. The alleged holocaust in 1942-1943 is therefore only one example out of several similar accusations, but this one has strictly to be believed in by citizens of many of the European states. Also this thesis of a "holocaust" has been presented in ever varying versions.
So, how did the story develop? By 1941 reports originating from the communist underground of the CC's reached the US government and the Vatican about mass murder in Auschwitz. The alleged weapon was however not "Zyclone B," but a sophisticated killing machine, best described as a pneumatic hammer or compressed air gun, alternatively electric high voltage baths and war gas.
However these accusations were totally rejected by the officials in London and Washington. Not only had the Allies information from dozens of resistance groups, the secret services had also broken the German radio codes and carefully monitored any broadcasts between the CC's and the HQ's in Berlin. There were also secret reports by hundreds of agents in the German controlled territories. Even from the office of Adolf Hitler himself there was an important flow of information to Allied secret services. In addition, the Vatican had plenty of informants from the catholic clergymen in Poland and other eastern countries. The Red Cross also informed the Allies about all circumstances of the camps. So the accusations were taken as mere propaganda by the well informed Allied administrations. However, the rumours were enforced by Soviet atrocity propaganda, particularly after the mass murder by the NKVD in Katyn. In the West, articles in newspapers appeared again, especially in the N.Y. Times. A communication from the president of the "Joint Intelligence Committee," Victor Cavendish-Bentinck rejected any possibility, that the "holocaust" story could be based on fact. Slowly however, the Western Allies officially adopted and propagated the thesis of the mass murder, when Soviet atrocities in the course of the occupation of the Eastern parts of Germany became evident. This is clearly documented in a letter by a British propaganda office to wide circles of recipients to that effect.
The first reports about Zyklon B materialized in an official US report of 1944 according to statements of four or five persons, who claimed to have been eye witnesses to a mass murder by Zyclone B in gas chambers in Auschwitz. However, in the beginning, this version of the holocaust hypothesis was merely one among dozens. Witnesses tell about killing of Jews by the thousands in one moment by high voltage current on huge, 7 km wide underground steel platforms. They tell about killing by vacuum chambers, electric baths, chlorine gas, mustard gas, steam, by burning alive, by virtual transformation of a crematorium into a veritable gas chamber, by drowning, shooting, on heaps of burned lime in railway wagons, suffocation by gas from shower heads or from underground sources, or, alternatively, by gas slowly emanating from the solid Zyclone B put into the notorious gas chambers by several different methods, by blood poisoning, by suffocating in lorries or in buses, where the exhaust gas had been led into the passenger compartment, by hand grenades, by boiling water, by deadly acids, by diesel motor exhaust gas, by traceless annihilation via a newly developed explosive in a village built exclusively for that purpose, or, even by a German atomic bomb. All this had allegedly happened in the manner of an industrial project according to a rigid master plan designed by one master mind, which was transmitted to the many executive organs by some sort of telepathy and wordless understanding.
The Holocaust gassing story thus suggests a lack of coordination by the Nazi government. There is a simultaneous adoption of varied methods, which would have yielded varied results to carry out what is typically described as a centralized industrial "genocide." In fact, the official Holocaust story itself suggests that the program was anything but centrally organized and the methods were evolved in a rather chaotic manner in the field.
Also the numbers presented for the victims of the alleged mass murder differ to an astonishing degree in various versions of the thesis. The most important witness in the first years of the development of the thesis is the SS officer Kurt Gerstein. He is said to have presented as many as six different versions of his mass murder story and the highest number: 26 million victims! He later died in mysterious circumstances in prison. As a Non-Jew, he had obviously not heard about the importance of the 6-million figure.
Under torture, Auschwitz Commandant, Höß "confessed" that there were 2.5 million victims of the gas chambers. Continued discussion of the thesis by the revisionist authors succeeded in the reduction of the official numbers for the Auschwitz complex by 2.5 to 3 millions, however, without equivalent reduction of the overall victim count. Here and there each official author reduced the numbers further in the course of time, until Fritjof Meyer eventually ended up with the equally unfounded speculation of 356,000 gas chamber victims. Thus any of the versions presented is severely at variance with the others.
At the end of WWII Germany sank into chaotic coma: many millions of refugees and displaced persons without homes formed part of a tragic odyssey. It was impossible to tell about the level of any ethnicity. Yet the Jewish leaders immediately came out with their precise accusation that no less than six million of their kindred had been killed by the Germans. Later, Jewish statistics were published disclosing that world Jewry had not been diminished during WWII. It was not until after 1950 that six million vanished from the Jewish statistics. If the Jewish encyclopaedias were to be believed, yet another six-million-holocaust would have to be postulated, one that would have been executed by Polish or Russian perpetrators in the late 40's.
When Auschwitz was captured by Soviet troops in January 1945, a
reporter officially commenting the findings in the camp did not expend many
words writing about gas chambers. He reported about some of these chambers, but
found them in a place, where later witnesses have not described them. He did
however give a detailed and comprehensive description of an extraordinary "death
production line," where hundreds of Jews had been murdered in minutes. Western
or neutral observers were not invited; at least no account of such a visit has
come forth.
The task remained now to agree about the place where the gas chambers would have been located. In phase one of this process in 1946, it was decided that every CC had to posses its own gas chamber. There are, for example, some twenty highly differing designs and locations described for the Dachau gas chamber. For each of these chamber versions reliable witnesses were presented to courts and historians. However in 1960, the later director of the institute of contemporary history, Martin Broszat, made the revolutionary concession to the early revisionists that gas chambers had only been discovered in the CC's in far away Poland, which was under Communist rule and not accessible at that time. Thus the contradictory multitude of versions told about the Dachau gas chamber evaporated into thin air. No comment was offered as to why the quality and reliability of witnesses for eastern gas chambers were superior to the reliability of witnesses for the gas chambers in Dachau and Buchenwald. There was however a fundamentalist phase three: since 1983 minor gas chambers have been introduced in some of the western CC's. In 2002 a leading German journalist and historian, Fritjof Meyer, officially gave up trying to determine the location of the chambers in the Auschwitz complex and suggested without proof, that gassings had instead been executed in two farm houses some km away from the camps. Meanwhile there is the tendency gradually to give up the story of homicidal gas chambers in the concentration camps. Instead, the latest version of the thesis (told by Goldhagen) transfers the "murder of the six million" to hundreds and thousands of unnamed and undescribed localities, small ghettoes, and "Shtetl's." However the backbone of the thesis, common to all the contradictory versions remains constant: 6 million Jews, master plan, industrial manner of execution.
There is also a version of the "gas chamber thesis" ex negativo:
Any mentioning of mass murder is avoided in the memoirs of Eisenhower, Adenauer, Churchill and others, and also the Vatican remains silent with respect to this issue. All Vatican documents remain unpublished for the relevant time period. The Red Cross however had access to all CC's and the delegates could freely and without surveillance talk to the inmates. A comprehensive report (3 volumes) was published in 1948 about the conditions in the camps. The delegates of the ICRC found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the Jews. In all its 1,600 pages the Report does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. The Red Cross Report clarifies the legitimate circumstances under which Jews were detained in concentration camps, i.e. for security reasons according to the principles of 1929 Geneva military convention as enemy aliens, due to several declarations of war against Germany by international Jewish Agencies. From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about 1,112,000 parcels with a total weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps and supervision was regular. The report clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report: "In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 . . . In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner (took place) . . . (Additional) relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp . . ." (Vol. III, p. 83). The ICRC states that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interest of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against "the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies".
In many European countries, unprejudiced research into these matters is only possible if the scientist carries out private studies all at his own expense and without any grants from state institutions. In addition he places in jeopardy his freedom, his health, his fortune, his family, and his entire way of life. Attempted murder against revisionists is not an exception and many people that knew too much have died under suspicious circumstances. In spite of this, it is actually a great thing that so many individuals from different countries, backgrounds and education, with widely varying political views and religious beliefs have devoted themselves to this mission.
I owe the information given in this report to the books of Germar Rudolf, Gerd Honsik, Don Heddesheimer, Bruno Montoriol, and to many other authors.
History is supposed to be a science and therefore historical hypotheses are not supposed to be simply "believed" or falsified, but verified by scientific argument. I am a scientist, but I am not a martyr. Therefore I will carefully avoid giving anybody the impression that I might doubt the official version. Rather I wish to present actual facts to you about the history of the presentation of the "holocaust" hypothesis and I hope you will find this to be an interesting, if not indeed, a fascinating article on the subject.
If one examines the various manifestations that the "holocaust" has adopted over the years, one gets a vague and confused picture without solid shape, like a demon emanating from a bottle. We are presented not with one big holocaust but a multitude of widely varying stories, forming a sort of continuum from as early as 1900 almost to the present day.
Elements of the tale of a "holocaust" go back to ancient myths of the Jahwe cult. A prophecy would have it Jahwe would give back "their land" to the followers of this desert tribe religion after the mythical figure of 6 million Jews had lost their lives in fire ovens. The Zionist movement exploited this myth from its earliest days. In 1900, the N.Y. Times reported an address made by Rabbi S. Wise at a Zionist fund raising campaign: "There are 6 million living, bleeding, suffering arguments for Zionism . . ." In 1915, the N.Y. Times knew of " . . . 6 million Jews endangered (by Russia, GK) in the war zone of WWI, who were enduring danger to life, grief and misery . . ." In 1916 a book (published in 25.000 copies) was distributed to the top ranks of public life and the military in the USA entitled, "The Jews in the eastern War Zone." It claimed that the Russians were concentrating 6 million Jews in a sort of huge prison, guarded by an army of corrupt and brute camp guards. In those days the alleged perpetrators changed, but constantly 6 million Jews were the victims. An exception to this rule was the report by the London Daily Telegraph in 1916 which claimed that Austria and Bulgaria had killed some 700,000 Jews in local churches in Serbia by suffocation with poisonous gas and by stabbing. Notably, a nearly identical report was published by the very same newspaper in 1942, "Germans have killed 700,000 Jews in Poland by movable gas chambers, biggest massacre in world history . . ."
In 1919 a really heartbreaking article appeared in a Jewish US newspaper, ". . . 6 million Jewish men and women are whirled towards the grave . . . are dying . . . crying for help, 6 million in the threatened holocaust . . ." Interestingly, the headline of this article contained an antichristian religious connotation: "The crucifixion of Jews . . . must stop!" From 1917 to 1927 a wealth of comparable reports were published in various newspapers, especially in the "New York Times." The readers were informed of the incredible misery and danger to life of mostly 6 million, sometimes four or five million Jews. These campaigns have been seen as motivated by the Balfour Declaration and the necessity to collect money for the realization of the emigration to Palestine. Anti-Jewish persecutions in Poland triggered the dramatic protest of Dr. Joseph Tenenbaum, the chairman of the American Jewish Congress in 1932: "The Jewish people all over the world face a war of extinction . . ."
In 1936 the US Peel Commission had to try to bring peace to Palestine after heavy fighting between Arabs and Jewish militia. Before this commission Chaim Weizmann emphatically declared that ". . . 6 million Jews in Europe had to live "unwanted" and endangered as if detained in a prison . . ." In those days only some 300,000 Jews (5% of the overall figure) lived in Germany.
In 1991, Jewish officials in US newspapers accused Iraq, and Germany of developing a new, and highly effective gas "containing Zyklon-B," to be used in homicidal gas chambers ready "for all Jews," "6 million Jews"; even pictures of these gas chambers were shown: The fourth or fifth "holocaust" in this century. The alleged holocaust in 1942-1943 is therefore only one example out of several similar accusations, but this one has strictly to be believed in by citizens of many of the European states. Also this thesis of a "holocaust" has been presented in ever varying versions.
So, how did the story develop? By 1941 reports originating from the communist underground of the CC's reached the US government and the Vatican about mass murder in Auschwitz. The alleged weapon was however not "Zyclone B," but a sophisticated killing machine, best described as a pneumatic hammer or compressed air gun, alternatively electric high voltage baths and war gas.
However these accusations were totally rejected by the officials in London and Washington. Not only had the Allies information from dozens of resistance groups, the secret services had also broken the German radio codes and carefully monitored any broadcasts between the CC's and the HQ's in Berlin. There were also secret reports by hundreds of agents in the German controlled territories. Even from the office of Adolf Hitler himself there was an important flow of information to Allied secret services. In addition, the Vatican had plenty of informants from the catholic clergymen in Poland and other eastern countries. The Red Cross also informed the Allies about all circumstances of the camps. So the accusations were taken as mere propaganda by the well informed Allied administrations. However, the rumours were enforced by Soviet atrocity propaganda, particularly after the mass murder by the NKVD in Katyn. In the West, articles in newspapers appeared again, especially in the N.Y. Times. A communication from the president of the "Joint Intelligence Committee," Victor Cavendish-Bentinck rejected any possibility, that the "holocaust" story could be based on fact. Slowly however, the Western Allies officially adopted and propagated the thesis of the mass murder, when Soviet atrocities in the course of the occupation of the Eastern parts of Germany became evident. This is clearly documented in a letter by a British propaganda office to wide circles of recipients to that effect.
The first reports about Zyklon B materialized in an official US report of 1944 according to statements of four or five persons, who claimed to have been eye witnesses to a mass murder by Zyclone B in gas chambers in Auschwitz. However, in the beginning, this version of the holocaust hypothesis was merely one among dozens. Witnesses tell about killing of Jews by the thousands in one moment by high voltage current on huge, 7 km wide underground steel platforms. They tell about killing by vacuum chambers, electric baths, chlorine gas, mustard gas, steam, by burning alive, by virtual transformation of a crematorium into a veritable gas chamber, by drowning, shooting, on heaps of burned lime in railway wagons, suffocation by gas from shower heads or from underground sources, or, alternatively, by gas slowly emanating from the solid Zyclone B put into the notorious gas chambers by several different methods, by blood poisoning, by suffocating in lorries or in buses, where the exhaust gas had been led into the passenger compartment, by hand grenades, by boiling water, by deadly acids, by diesel motor exhaust gas, by traceless annihilation via a newly developed explosive in a village built exclusively for that purpose, or, even by a German atomic bomb. All this had allegedly happened in the manner of an industrial project according to a rigid master plan designed by one master mind, which was transmitted to the many executive organs by some sort of telepathy and wordless understanding.
The Holocaust gassing story thus suggests a lack of coordination by the Nazi government. There is a simultaneous adoption of varied methods, which would have yielded varied results to carry out what is typically described as a centralized industrial "genocide." In fact, the official Holocaust story itself suggests that the program was anything but centrally organized and the methods were evolved in a rather chaotic manner in the field.
Also the numbers presented for the victims of the alleged mass murder differ to an astonishing degree in various versions of the thesis. The most important witness in the first years of the development of the thesis is the SS officer Kurt Gerstein. He is said to have presented as many as six different versions of his mass murder story and the highest number: 26 million victims! He later died in mysterious circumstances in prison. As a Non-Jew, he had obviously not heard about the importance of the 6-million figure.
Under torture, Auschwitz Commandant, Höß "confessed" that there were 2.5 million victims of the gas chambers. Continued discussion of the thesis by the revisionist authors succeeded in the reduction of the official numbers for the Auschwitz complex by 2.5 to 3 millions, however, without equivalent reduction of the overall victim count. Here and there each official author reduced the numbers further in the course of time, until Fritjof Meyer eventually ended up with the equally unfounded speculation of 356,000 gas chamber victims. Thus any of the versions presented is severely at variance with the others.
At the end of WWII Germany sank into chaotic coma: many millions of refugees and displaced persons without homes formed part of a tragic odyssey. It was impossible to tell about the level of any ethnicity. Yet the Jewish leaders immediately came out with their precise accusation that no less than six million of their kindred had been killed by the Germans. Later, Jewish statistics were published disclosing that world Jewry had not been diminished during WWII. It was not until after 1950 that six million vanished from the Jewish statistics. If the Jewish encyclopaedias were to be believed, yet another six-million-holocaust would have to be postulated, one that would have been executed by Polish or Russian perpetrators in the late 40's.
When Auschwitz was captured by Soviet troops in January 1945, a
reporter officially commenting the findings in the camp did not expend many
words writing about gas chambers. He reported about some of these chambers, but
found them in a place, where later witnesses have not described them. He did
however give a detailed and comprehensive description of an extraordinary "death
production line," where hundreds of Jews had been murdered in minutes. Western
or neutral observers were not invited; at least no account of such a visit has
come forth. The task remained now to agree about the place where the gas chambers would have been located. In phase one of this process in 1946, it was decided that every CC had to posses its own gas chamber. There are, for example, some twenty highly differing designs and locations described for the Dachau gas chamber. For each of these chamber versions reliable witnesses were presented to courts and historians. However in 1960, the later director of the institute of contemporary history, Martin Broszat, made the revolutionary concession to the early revisionists that gas chambers had only been discovered in the CC's in far away Poland, which was under Communist rule and not accessible at that time. Thus the contradictory multitude of versions told about the Dachau gas chamber evaporated into thin air. No comment was offered as to why the quality and reliability of witnesses for eastern gas chambers were superior to the reliability of witnesses for the gas chambers in Dachau and Buchenwald. There was however a fundamentalist phase three: since 1983 minor gas chambers have been introduced in some of the western CC's. In 2002 a leading German journalist and historian, Fritjof Meyer, officially gave up trying to determine the location of the chambers in the Auschwitz complex and suggested without proof, that gassings had instead been executed in two farm houses some km away from the camps. Meanwhile there is the tendency gradually to give up the story of homicidal gas chambers in the concentration camps. Instead, the latest version of the thesis (told by Goldhagen) transfers the "murder of the six million" to hundreds and thousands of unnamed and undescribed localities, small ghettoes, and "Shtetl's." However the backbone of the thesis, common to all the contradictory versions remains constant: 6 million Jews, master plan, industrial manner of execution.
There is also a version of the "gas chamber thesis" ex negativo:
Any mentioning of mass murder is avoided in the memoirs of Eisenhower, Adenauer, Churchill and others, and also the Vatican remains silent with respect to this issue. All Vatican documents remain unpublished for the relevant time period. The Red Cross however had access to all CC's and the delegates could freely and without surveillance talk to the inmates. A comprehensive report (3 volumes) was published in 1948 about the conditions in the camps. The delegates of the ICRC found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the Jews. In all its 1,600 pages the Report does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. The Red Cross Report clarifies the legitimate circumstances under which Jews were detained in concentration camps, i.e. for security reasons according to the principles of 1929 Geneva military convention as enemy aliens, due to several declarations of war against Germany by international Jewish Agencies. From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about 1,112,000 parcels with a total weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps and supervision was regular. The report clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report: "In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 . . . In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner (took place) . . . (Additional) relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp . . ." (Vol. III, p. 83). The ICRC states that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interest of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against "the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies".
All Israel is not of Israel
Malachi 2:17 – 3:4,
"You have wearied the Lord with your words, yet you say: How have we wearied
Him? When by your actions you say, Everyone who does evil is good in the sight
of the Lord, and He delights in them; in other words, Where is the God of
justice, [whenever will He come to bless us by restoring the kingdom]?"
The Israelites anticipated Messiah's first Coming as a military Commander according to the prophesies for His third Coming to destroy Rome and restore the Kingdom to Israel (Acts 1:6) yet Isaiah 7:14 prophesied the One Person of God would manifest in a virgin-born baby to fulfill the part of Adam's KINSMAN Redeemer (Luke 7:26; 1:1-9). Malachi quotes Isaiah 40:3 like John the Baptist in John 1:19-27 without distinguishing His first Coming from His second return because it is a revelation like Brother Branham's 'third pull'—the mystery of the Seven Thunders of the unwritten Seventh Seal.
"[Your unbelief will not prevent Me from honouring My Covenant, and bringing to pass in due time that which you say will never be fulfilled]. I will send My messenger [John the Baptist (Isaiah 40:3)], and he shall prepare the way before Me: and the Lord, whom you seek, shall unexpectedly come to His Temple [at Jerusalem]. The Messenger of the Covenant, in whom you delight: behold, He is coming, says the Lord of hosts."
The Temple has been destroyed for almost two thousand years and we know that He came while it was yet standing, and that the non-Semitic, anti-Semitic self-styled Jews who are impersonating Jacob/Israel today are intent on building a third temple to protect their religious business and cover their iniquity in crucifying God's true Temple as the holocaust hoax is cover for the atrocities of Jewry (and also the Allies) in World War II (Haggai 2:3-9; Matthew 27:25; John 11:47-48).
"But who can endure the day of His Coming to destroy Jerusalem and the theocracy after they had rejected Him, [to subject their principles to the fiery test (Matthew 3:10-12), and to submit the nation to the Seven Trumpet judgments? The process of refining and separating the godly from the ungodly begun in the days of His flesh is ongoing. And who will be able to stand when He appears [as the Judge you seek] in His second or 'parousia' Coming to Israel]? The refining process will see the so-called Jews destroyed together with two-thirds of the Israelites while a third of the Israelites will be refined as silver of its dross (Zechariah 13:8-9)].
"Then shall the offering of Judah and Jerusalem be pleasant to the Lord, as in the days of old, and as in former years".
Brother Branham said, "Go into the prophet's chamber and watch them
seven steps. Where did the guard meet the challenge to bring the comer into the
presence of the king at the top of the steps? Was in the seventh step. There
shows that we've got to come again with that same Spirit that was on John. He
introduced the Messiah; he was greater than all the prophets; he introduced it
[Matthew 11:9-11].
And we've got to come to a place again, to something that's going to introduce the Messiah. And how will the people that's believing Him know it, unless they're constantly in the Word to know what He is. Daniel said, "the wise shall know, but the foolish, the unwise wouldn't know. They shall know their God" (The Feast of the Trumpets, p. 15:112-113; Daniel 12:10).
More than ninety per cent of today's Jewry is known as Ashkenazim. Ashkenazim are descended from the Khazars—a Turko-Mongoloid people, who nearly 2,000 years ago, came out of Middle Asia and settled in Khazaria, which later became southern Russia (the Ukraine and Georgia). Their ancestors never set foot in Palestine. In the 8th century AD the Khazars converted to Judaism that is the antithesis of the Law and the prophets (Matthew 15:9). Judaism and its holy book the Babylonian Talmud came out of Pharisaism, a false, man-made religion propagated by the Pharisees in the time of Jesus Christ. The following Jewish sources confirm this:
"This is not an uncommon impression—and one finds it sometimes among Jews as well as Christians—that Judaism is the religion of the Hebrew Bible [Old Testament]. It is, of course, a fallacious impression . . . Judaism is not the religion of the Bible" (Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser, "Judaism and the Christian Predicament," p. 59).
". . . the return from Babylon and the adoption of the Babylonian Talmud [instigated by the Edomites after they converted to Talmudism in about 123BC], mark the end of Hebrewism and the beginning of [Pharisaism or] Judaism" (Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, formerly Chief Rabbi of the United States).
"Judaism is specifically the religion of a Jewish community living among Gentile peoples and is to be distinguished from the religion of ancient Israel" (Funk & Wagnalls Standard Reference Encyclopedia, 1959, Volume 14).
The Ashkenazim take their name from Ashkenaz, one of Noah's grandsons through Japheth, and not Shem from whose name we have the word "Semite" and from whom the true Semitic peoples, who include many Arabs, are descended. As such the Ashkenazim are not Semites let alone Hebrews or Israelites. Like the Ashkenazim the Sephardim have not descended from Israelites but from Edomites, other Canaanites and Samaritans, who include the Sepharvaim, a people from Cutha, Ava, and Hamath sent by the Assyrian King to the land of Israel to replace the Israelites who, having chosen the trinitarian gods of Hamath and Sippara (north of Babylon), were exiled to those places. The Jewish encyclopaedias admit that both Khazars and Edomites are found in modern Jewry. Here are some more quotes from Jewish sources:
"Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a "Jew," or to call a contemporary Jew [an] "Israelite," or a "Hebrew" (Jewish Almanac, 1980).
"At one time during the emancipation era there was a tendency among Jews to avoid the application of the term [Jew] to themselves; and from 1860 onward the words "Hebrew" and "Israelite" were employed to represent persons of Jewish faith and race . . ." (Jewish Encyclopaedia, 1901-1906, under "Jew (the word)").
In the late 19th century, Jewish anthropologists measured the cephalic skull indices of a sample of Jews from all over the world, and then set about comparing their results with the cephalic indices of ancient Hebrew and modern Semitic skulls. Their findings state:
"The most important problem suggested by a study of craniometrical results concerning Jews is the relation of the type of head of the modern Jews to that of the ancient Hebrews and to the modern Semitic skulls. The pure Semitic skull is dolichocephalic, as may be seen from a study of the heads of modern Arabs, Abyssinians, Syrians, etc, . . . If the ancient Hebrews were of the same stock as the modern non-Jewish Semites, and if the modern Jews are their descendants, then a pure dolichocephalic type of head would be expected among the Jews. As has been seen, all the results of craniometry prove that the Jews are brachycephalic, and that the dolichocephalic form is only found among them in less than two per cent of cases" (Jewish Encyclopaedia 1906, under "Craniometry").
The Israelites anticipated Messiah's first Coming as a military Commander according to the prophesies for His third Coming to destroy Rome and restore the Kingdom to Israel (Acts 1:6) yet Isaiah 7:14 prophesied the One Person of God would manifest in a virgin-born baby to fulfill the part of Adam's KINSMAN Redeemer (Luke 7:26; 1:1-9). Malachi quotes Isaiah 40:3 like John the Baptist in John 1:19-27 without distinguishing His first Coming from His second return because it is a revelation like Brother Branham's 'third pull'—the mystery of the Seven Thunders of the unwritten Seventh Seal.
"[Your unbelief will not prevent Me from honouring My Covenant, and bringing to pass in due time that which you say will never be fulfilled]. I will send My messenger [John the Baptist (Isaiah 40:3)], and he shall prepare the way before Me: and the Lord, whom you seek, shall unexpectedly come to His Temple [at Jerusalem]. The Messenger of the Covenant, in whom you delight: behold, He is coming, says the Lord of hosts."
The Temple has been destroyed for almost two thousand years and we know that He came while it was yet standing, and that the non-Semitic, anti-Semitic self-styled Jews who are impersonating Jacob/Israel today are intent on building a third temple to protect their religious business and cover their iniquity in crucifying God's true Temple as the holocaust hoax is cover for the atrocities of Jewry (and also the Allies) in World War II (Haggai 2:3-9; Matthew 27:25; John 11:47-48).
"But who can endure the day of His Coming to destroy Jerusalem and the theocracy after they had rejected Him, [to subject their principles to the fiery test (Matthew 3:10-12), and to submit the nation to the Seven Trumpet judgments? The process of refining and separating the godly from the ungodly begun in the days of His flesh is ongoing. And who will be able to stand when He appears [as the Judge you seek] in His second or 'parousia' Coming to Israel]? The refining process will see the so-called Jews destroyed together with two-thirds of the Israelites while a third of the Israelites will be refined as silver of its dross (Zechariah 13:8-9)].
"Then shall the offering of Judah and Jerusalem be pleasant to the Lord, as in the days of old, and as in former years".
Brother Branham said, "Go into the prophet's chamber and watch them
seven steps. Where did the guard meet the challenge to bring the comer into the
presence of the king at the top of the steps? Was in the seventh step. There
shows that we've got to come again with that same Spirit that was on John. He
introduced the Messiah; he was greater than all the prophets; he introduced it
[Matthew 11:9-11]. And we've got to come to a place again, to something that's going to introduce the Messiah. And how will the people that's believing Him know it, unless they're constantly in the Word to know what He is. Daniel said, "the wise shall know, but the foolish, the unwise wouldn't know. They shall know their God" (The Feast of the Trumpets, p. 15:112-113; Daniel 12:10).
More than ninety per cent of today's Jewry is known as Ashkenazim. Ashkenazim are descended from the Khazars—a Turko-Mongoloid people, who nearly 2,000 years ago, came out of Middle Asia and settled in Khazaria, which later became southern Russia (the Ukraine and Georgia). Their ancestors never set foot in Palestine. In the 8th century AD the Khazars converted to Judaism that is the antithesis of the Law and the prophets (Matthew 15:9). Judaism and its holy book the Babylonian Talmud came out of Pharisaism, a false, man-made religion propagated by the Pharisees in the time of Jesus Christ. The following Jewish sources confirm this:
"This is not an uncommon impression—and one finds it sometimes among Jews as well as Christians—that Judaism is the religion of the Hebrew Bible [Old Testament]. It is, of course, a fallacious impression . . . Judaism is not the religion of the Bible" (Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser, "Judaism and the Christian Predicament," p. 59).
". . . the return from Babylon and the adoption of the Babylonian Talmud [instigated by the Edomites after they converted to Talmudism in about 123BC], mark the end of Hebrewism and the beginning of [Pharisaism or] Judaism" (Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, formerly Chief Rabbi of the United States).
"Judaism is specifically the religion of a Jewish community living among Gentile peoples and is to be distinguished from the religion of ancient Israel" (Funk & Wagnalls Standard Reference Encyclopedia, 1959, Volume 14).
The Ashkenazim take their name from Ashkenaz, one of Noah's grandsons through Japheth, and not Shem from whose name we have the word "Semite" and from whom the true Semitic peoples, who include many Arabs, are descended. As such the Ashkenazim are not Semites let alone Hebrews or Israelites. Like the Ashkenazim the Sephardim have not descended from Israelites but from Edomites, other Canaanites and Samaritans, who include the Sepharvaim, a people from Cutha, Ava, and Hamath sent by the Assyrian King to the land of Israel to replace the Israelites who, having chosen the trinitarian gods of Hamath and Sippara (north of Babylon), were exiled to those places. The Jewish encyclopaedias admit that both Khazars and Edomites are found in modern Jewry. Here are some more quotes from Jewish sources:
"Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a "Jew," or to call a contemporary Jew [an] "Israelite," or a "Hebrew" (Jewish Almanac, 1980).
"At one time during the emancipation era there was a tendency among Jews to avoid the application of the term [Jew] to themselves; and from 1860 onward the words "Hebrew" and "Israelite" were employed to represent persons of Jewish faith and race . . ." (Jewish Encyclopaedia, 1901-1906, under "Jew (the word)").
In the late 19th century, Jewish anthropologists measured the cephalic skull indices of a sample of Jews from all over the world, and then set about comparing their results with the cephalic indices of ancient Hebrew and modern Semitic skulls. Their findings state:
"The most important problem suggested by a study of craniometrical results concerning Jews is the relation of the type of head of the modern Jews to that of the ancient Hebrews and to the modern Semitic skulls. The pure Semitic skull is dolichocephalic, as may be seen from a study of the heads of modern Arabs, Abyssinians, Syrians, etc, . . . If the ancient Hebrews were of the same stock as the modern non-Jewish Semites, and if the modern Jews are their descendants, then a pure dolichocephalic type of head would be expected among the Jews. As has been seen, all the results of craniometry prove that the Jews are brachycephalic, and that the dolichocephalic form is only found among them in less than two per cent of cases" (Jewish Encyclopaedia 1906, under "Craniometry").
The Jews are a mixed
race, practically none of whom are descended from the ancient Israelites as the
rabbis falsely claim. In truth, the study of Jewish craniometry tells us that
modern Jews are most closely related to the ancient Hittites and other
Canaanites, not the ancient Semites. This explains, for example, why the Jews
reckon descent through the maternal rather than the paternal line as, in
contrast to the ancient Hebrews and Israelites who always took the latter
approach, the Hittites and other Canaanites took the former. The true
identity of modern day Jews was recently confirmed by DNA studies performed by
Jewish geneticist Dr. Eran Elhaik of the McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic
Medicine, part of John Hopkins University in the US. Dr Elhaik's findings are
set out in his report entitled "The Missing Link of
Jewish European Ancestry: Contrasting the Rhineland and the Khazarian
Hypotheses" (published 2013).
Now I will deal with the true identity of the Jews of the New Testament. Again there is much confusion about this, most of it arising out of a lack of knowledge of the history of the land of Judea leading up to the arrival of Jesus Christ on the scene. This is compounded by our failure to correctly understand the proper meaning of the Hebrew and Greek words translated "Jew" in the Old Testament and New Testament respectively. They did not mean one and the same thing.
In the Old Testament the word "Jew" is from the Hebrew "Yhuwdiy" (pl. "Yhuwdim"). The word "Yhuwdiy" was an ethnic term and it meant a "Judahite," that is a "descendant of Judah," the patriarch of only one of the twelve tribes of Israel. Hence Abraham, Isaac and Jacob could not possibly have been "Yhuwdim" (translated "Jews") as Jacob had not even been born. Neither was Moses an "Yhuwdiy" (translated "Jew") as he, being a Levite of the tribe of Levi, was not a descendant of Judah either. Indeed the word "Yhuwdiy" does not appear until the twelfth book of the Old Testament. This is because it was never used until after God had divided the nation of Israel into two separate and distinct Kingdoms, the ten-tribed House of Israel in the north (in the land of Samaria) and the two-tribed House of Judah in the south (in the land of Judah, later renamed Judea). Only the House of Judah is referred to as "Yhuwdim" (translated "Jews") in the Old Testament. No member of the ten-tribed House of Israel is ever referred to as a "Yhuwdiy" (translated "Jew").
In the New Testament the word "Jew" is from the Koine Greek "Ioudaios." This was not an ethnic term, it was a geopolitical term and it referred to a "Judean," that is any person who was an inhabitant of the land of Judea regardless of race, religion or creed. It was, therefore, like the terms "Glaswegian" or "Texan." These words tell us where a person lives, but tell us nothing about their ethnic or religious background. For example, a Chinaman who lives in Glasgow is correctly called a Glaswegian, but that does not make him an ethnic Scot. It is an easily established Biblical and secular historical fact that the vast majority of the New Testament Judeans (translated "Jews" in the New Testament, but only since the late eighteenth century) were not Israelites. This is why only a few Judeans believed on the Lord Jesus as most of them were imposters, mainly Edomites (descendants of Esau) whose intent was only to murder Jesus in an attempt to steal His inheritance, the inheritance that their forefather Esau had despised and so carelessly handed away to his brother Jacob (the parable of the wicked husbandmen shows that they knew exactly who Jesus was and that this was their game).
This also helps to explain why Jesus had numerous heated altercations with the Judeans (translated "Jews") of the New Testament; at one point He actually had them admit that they were not Israelites:
"We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man" (John 8:33).
The Pharisees here state that they are descended from Abraham but have never been in bondage. But we know that all Israel were in bondage in Egypt (Exodus 1:1-5, 13-14), later also being taken captive by the Assyrians and Babylonians. The Pharisees cannot, therefore, have been Israelites. Now, and this is important, please do not believe anyone who tells you that the Pharisees were lying when they made this statement. If you do then you are prepared to accept that the Lord Jesus is a liar because not only does He not rebuke the Pharisees for making this claim, but a few verses later He actually confirms what they say:
"I know that you are Abraham's seed . . . [but] . . . If you were Abraham's children, you would do the works of Abraham" (John 8:37, 39).
The Lord Jesus accepts their claim of descent from Abraham, but makes it clear that they are not "Abraham's children." What does He mean by the expression "Abraham's children"? There is no need to attempt to spiritualise this expression away as many do. Indeed it is grave error, as Paul provides us with a full explanation of it in Romans 9 and it is not a spiritual matter:
"Not as though the Word of God has taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: neither, because they are the seed of Abraham are they all children: [ring any bells? Now here is the explanation] but, In Isaac shall your seed be called. That is, they which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed" (Romans 9:6-8).
Paul then goes on to explain how the promises passed from Isaac to Jacob/Israel. Paul is telling us here that not all of those calling themselves "Israel" are actually Israelites. He explains that being descended from Abraham is not sufficient to make them "children" but rather only the "children of the promise"—those descended from Abraham, Isaac and Jacob—are counted for the seed. So the "children" the Lord Jesus is speaking about in John Chapter 8 are the "children of the promise." And in case we are still in any doubt as to the identity of the "children of the promise," Paul confirms it for us:
"For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh: who are Israelites; to whom pertains the adoption, and the glory, and the Covenants, and the giving of the Law, and the service of God, and the promises; whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came" (Romans 9:3-5).
Paul is telling us well after the Lord Jesus has been and gone that the "children of the promise" are flesh and blood Israelites, his "kinsmen according to the flesh" as he calls them: descendants of Jacob/Israel. So we see that in John Chapter 8 the Lord Jesus does indeed confirm the revelation by the Pharisees that they are not Israelites. They cannot be Israelites as they are not "children of the promise": they are not descended from Jacob/Israel. Has it never struck you as odd that the Pharisees never claimed to be descended from Jacob, only claiming descent from Abraham? Now you know the reason why.
You should also note that the Lord Jesus was not a Judean (translated "Jew" in the New Testament) as He did not live in the land of Judea; He was a Galilean and therefore He was not a "Jew." He was a Judahite, a true Israelite of the tribe of Judah. So also Paul distinguished himself from "Jewry" (Philippians 3:4-7). This should also help to explain who the Lord Jesus was referring to in the following verses:
". . . I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews [properly in reference to Judahites here], and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan" (Revelation 2:9).
"Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews [again in reference to Judahites], and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you [true Israel]" (Revelation 3:9).
In 1976 Walter White Jr., Director and Editor of the conservative monthly, Western Front, interviewed Harold Rosenthal, senior Administrative Aide to Senator Jacob Javits concerning his boastings around Washington DC of Jewish dominance in all significant national programs. His response to my question, "Do you know when and why the story began about the Jews being God's chosen people?" was in part: "Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer—so I wasn't lying—and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive" (The Hidden Tryanny, Genesis 3:15).
Who do you know who claim to be "Judah" other than the Jews? Who worship in a synagogue other than Jews? The Lord Jesus is telling us that there are imposters posing as true Judahites, members of the tribe or House of Judah, but who are, in fact, the "synagogue of Satan." In our Lord Jesus' day they were the majority of those people referred to in the Scriptures as Judeans, the so-called "Jews" of your New Testament. Who are they today?
For further reading on this subject see The Jews are Not a Race by Jewish author Dr. Alfred Lilienthal. nl876.htm
Now I will deal with the true identity of the Jews of the New Testament. Again there is much confusion about this, most of it arising out of a lack of knowledge of the history of the land of Judea leading up to the arrival of Jesus Christ on the scene. This is compounded by our failure to correctly understand the proper meaning of the Hebrew and Greek words translated "Jew" in the Old Testament and New Testament respectively. They did not mean one and the same thing.
In the Old Testament the word "Jew" is from the Hebrew "Yhuwdiy" (pl. "Yhuwdim"). The word "Yhuwdiy" was an ethnic term and it meant a "Judahite," that is a "descendant of Judah," the patriarch of only one of the twelve tribes of Israel. Hence Abraham, Isaac and Jacob could not possibly have been "Yhuwdim" (translated "Jews") as Jacob had not even been born. Neither was Moses an "Yhuwdiy" (translated "Jew") as he, being a Levite of the tribe of Levi, was not a descendant of Judah either. Indeed the word "Yhuwdiy" does not appear until the twelfth book of the Old Testament. This is because it was never used until after God had divided the nation of Israel into two separate and distinct Kingdoms, the ten-tribed House of Israel in the north (in the land of Samaria) and the two-tribed House of Judah in the south (in the land of Judah, later renamed Judea). Only the House of Judah is referred to as "Yhuwdim" (translated "Jews") in the Old Testament. No member of the ten-tribed House of Israel is ever referred to as a "Yhuwdiy" (translated "Jew").
In the New Testament the word "Jew" is from the Koine Greek "Ioudaios." This was not an ethnic term, it was a geopolitical term and it referred to a "Judean," that is any person who was an inhabitant of the land of Judea regardless of race, religion or creed. It was, therefore, like the terms "Glaswegian" or "Texan." These words tell us where a person lives, but tell us nothing about their ethnic or religious background. For example, a Chinaman who lives in Glasgow is correctly called a Glaswegian, but that does not make him an ethnic Scot. It is an easily established Biblical and secular historical fact that the vast majority of the New Testament Judeans (translated "Jews" in the New Testament, but only since the late eighteenth century) were not Israelites. This is why only a few Judeans believed on the Lord Jesus as most of them were imposters, mainly Edomites (descendants of Esau) whose intent was only to murder Jesus in an attempt to steal His inheritance, the inheritance that their forefather Esau had despised and so carelessly handed away to his brother Jacob (the parable of the wicked husbandmen shows that they knew exactly who Jesus was and that this was their game).
This also helps to explain why Jesus had numerous heated altercations with the Judeans (translated "Jews") of the New Testament; at one point He actually had them admit that they were not Israelites:
"We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man" (John 8:33).
The Pharisees here state that they are descended from Abraham but have never been in bondage. But we know that all Israel were in bondage in Egypt (Exodus 1:1-5, 13-14), later also being taken captive by the Assyrians and Babylonians. The Pharisees cannot, therefore, have been Israelites. Now, and this is important, please do not believe anyone who tells you that the Pharisees were lying when they made this statement. If you do then you are prepared to accept that the Lord Jesus is a liar because not only does He not rebuke the Pharisees for making this claim, but a few verses later He actually confirms what they say:
"I know that you are Abraham's seed . . . [but] . . . If you were Abraham's children, you would do the works of Abraham" (John 8:37, 39).
The Lord Jesus accepts their claim of descent from Abraham, but makes it clear that they are not "Abraham's children." What does He mean by the expression "Abraham's children"? There is no need to attempt to spiritualise this expression away as many do. Indeed it is grave error, as Paul provides us with a full explanation of it in Romans 9 and it is not a spiritual matter:
"Not as though the Word of God has taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: neither, because they are the seed of Abraham are they all children: [ring any bells? Now here is the explanation] but, In Isaac shall your seed be called. That is, they which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed" (Romans 9:6-8).
Paul then goes on to explain how the promises passed from Isaac to Jacob/Israel. Paul is telling us here that not all of those calling themselves "Israel" are actually Israelites. He explains that being descended from Abraham is not sufficient to make them "children" but rather only the "children of the promise"—those descended from Abraham, Isaac and Jacob—are counted for the seed. So the "children" the Lord Jesus is speaking about in John Chapter 8 are the "children of the promise." And in case we are still in any doubt as to the identity of the "children of the promise," Paul confirms it for us:
"For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh: who are Israelites; to whom pertains the adoption, and the glory, and the Covenants, and the giving of the Law, and the service of God, and the promises; whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came" (Romans 9:3-5).
Paul is telling us well after the Lord Jesus has been and gone that the "children of the promise" are flesh and blood Israelites, his "kinsmen according to the flesh" as he calls them: descendants of Jacob/Israel. So we see that in John Chapter 8 the Lord Jesus does indeed confirm the revelation by the Pharisees that they are not Israelites. They cannot be Israelites as they are not "children of the promise": they are not descended from Jacob/Israel. Has it never struck you as odd that the Pharisees never claimed to be descended from Jacob, only claiming descent from Abraham? Now you know the reason why.
You should also note that the Lord Jesus was not a Judean (translated "Jew" in the New Testament) as He did not live in the land of Judea; He was a Galilean and therefore He was not a "Jew." He was a Judahite, a true Israelite of the tribe of Judah. So also Paul distinguished himself from "Jewry" (Philippians 3:4-7). This should also help to explain who the Lord Jesus was referring to in the following verses:
". . . I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews [properly in reference to Judahites here], and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan" (Revelation 2:9).
"Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews [again in reference to Judahites], and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you [true Israel]" (Revelation 3:9).
In 1976 Walter White Jr., Director and Editor of the conservative monthly, Western Front, interviewed Harold Rosenthal, senior Administrative Aide to Senator Jacob Javits concerning his boastings around Washington DC of Jewish dominance in all significant national programs. His response to my question, "Do you know when and why the story began about the Jews being God's chosen people?" was in part: "Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer—so I wasn't lying—and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive" (The Hidden Tryanny, Genesis 3:15).
Who do you know who claim to be "Judah" other than the Jews? Who worship in a synagogue other than Jews? The Lord Jesus is telling us that there are imposters posing as true Judahites, members of the tribe or House of Judah, but who are, in fact, the "synagogue of Satan." In our Lord Jesus' day they were the majority of those people referred to in the Scriptures as Judeans, the so-called "Jews" of your New Testament. Who are they today?
For further reading on this subject see The Jews are Not a Race by Jewish author Dr. Alfred Lilienthal. nl876.htm
Pass it on
. . . please send this article to someone you knowBrother Grigor-Scott is a non-denominational
minister who has ministered full-time since 1981, primarily to other ministers
and their congregations overseas. He pastors Bible Believers' tiny congregation,
and is available to teach in your church.
Bible Believers' Church
|
e-mail Bible Believers URL Bible Believers'
Website
|
No comments:
Post a Comment